Avatar of Ammokkx

Status

Recent Statuses

2 mos ago
Current you know, my SO never forces me to say a thing that's on my mind and doesn't mind if I don't always explain myself which makes it way easier to actually tell them stuff. boundaries good.
6 likes
2 mos ago
if your boyfriend loves you for who you are he already knows what you read without you needing to tell him
3 likes
5 mos ago
no, its the manufacturer's lack of a soul that's causing it to act up on you
11 likes
4 yrs ago
I'm starting to think I have serial profile stalkers
3 likes
4 yrs ago
as much as I'd love to pre-plan RPs, I've also noticed that's the fast track to killing them. A little planning and a rough gist is fine, but anything beyond that and people don't wanna write no more.
1 like

Bio

The day that Moss was hanged, eight others were cut down,
And when the graves had all been dug, the queen rode out of town.

Most Recent Posts

Oookay. So I assume that whoever posts first in the IC now is also the next to meet Endar?
Considering I already checked in with some people before posting, I think it's safe to implement it and try it out for a while.
'Kay, so, someone brought an issue with Action Duels to my attention. (And for the record, it wasn't Joshua)

With the way I currently do things, you can grab an Action card and be unable to use it for like 6 turns and you can't run for another while sitting on it. I propose the following change:

The current rules stay (1 Action Card per turn per player and only 1 in hand at a time), but there's an additional clause. If you find yourself with an Action Card in hand, but no way to use it, you can choose to throw away that action card and grab a new one. You can't throw away an action card on the same turn you get it, of course.

Anyone in favor? Anyone against? Reasons for being against if you are?
Ahh! Doing my best to stay relevant. I am currently on path to loan a computer off my friend semi-permanently until I can solve my larger problem. Will do my best to compose on a small screen til then.


You better get that computer or else we're all complete humans!

(also your character is like, really cool and unique too)
EDIT: I have decided that I will indeed go for a magic-based character. The only question is whether or not to take away his dagger or take away his rapier. I kind of like the rapier.


Keep the rapier, it's a sign of nobility.
@Ammokkx I never said that harpies were exclusively female, just predominantly.


I'm not one to go against norms- If something is a pattern, show it's a pattern instead of trying to subvert it before it's been established.

EDIT: I'm not going to lie, reminding myself of that harpy idea fills me with regret of not going for it. Curses.
Personally I'm hoping for a beast character, since nobody's actually quite gone for one yet


Should've told me to go with the harpy idea, mang.

(Real talk, I actually chose not to make one back when I did because we had quite a number of females already. That, and I feel I've been playing nothing but females recently.)
I feel like the characters are not only sufficiently different in temperament, history and personality as to not be redundant,


Not to mention the way they fight.
Man, I somehow just saw this, and it looks pretty cool. Just wanted to aske before I went through and read the entire OOC, is this still accepting last-minute submissions? If so, I can definitely get one in tonight.


According to the GM, as long as you mention interest before Wednesday you've got a little extra time to make a sheet.

Oh, I never meant you had to get a sheet in by then. Just that you needed to have told me you wanted to join. And I have spotted you once or twice; but I'd thought you'd left. So don't rush your character; there will be a good amount of time for you to get it all in, with what I have planned.
CollectorOfMyst


© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet