Andreyich

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

Because I think there are some folks in India that worshiped an 8-limbed child as a god, and I wouldn't be surprised if genemodding leads to some future Indian children being intentionally designed to have polymelia.

Those folks won't have access to such technology most likely, so the issue is non-existent. However, there is a general line that you can set, there are things there is no foreseeable downside to (i.e. removing disease) and those that there is, i.e. aforementioned arms.

However I don't we're going to get far with this, since from the discord I know of your lite-libertarian/voluntarist philosophy which will probably lead to us coming to a standstill on the deeper issues of our disagreement that can't forseeably be resolved.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

Still, the idea of parents being able to design their kids to simultaneously have oligodactylism, pygmyism, methemoglobinemia, and naturally white hair is bound to make lots of people uncomfortable.

There's a difference between making sure your kid doesn't have diabetes, and designing a freakshow because you watched a cool anime and now think your kid having heterochromia and white hair would be dope.

As others mentioned, there will be just like with vaccines those against improving mankind as a whole but as it stands their voice shouldn't and doesn't matter in the question.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

compulsory genemodding.

define "compulsory" in context.

I don't see anything wrong with removing all sorts of nasty things that can be passed on to someone just because a crazy cat lady read some conspiracy theory.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

The whole idea of consenting for someone in their place is a load of bullshit except for rather extreme cases, this not being one of them. Whoever the writers of the article took their idea from should not be allowed to have children.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

Near the end of the carriage of the baby it already has some level of sapience and has long since developed sentience even of a primitive scale. Once the child is carried out that's an independent human being and anyone who tries to kill it should be the one given aforementioned post birth abortion via chainsaw.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

Absolutely evil. This is what hedonism and other new age influences have lead to, killing of children post birth having an argument for it. I am relatively pro-abortion in that I condemn it in the majority of cases but I'm not for banning it, however this is disgusting. If you're such a shit human being to want to kill that child maybe you're the one who needs to be aborted after birth via chainsaw.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

Right, removing the ability for people to replace the native workforce is a dog whistle to racist elements. Man I don't know how people get retarded enough to think this up.

Deadland Wasteland: //START Recruitment.exe [OPEN - APPLY]

Busy, but I'll try to get some shit in. Just hard to decide how much balance of pussy and badass I need.

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

das raycis mayne

Frokane's Mildly Politcal Hangout Thread

Man ya got me. The whitecishetereopatriarchal system really does make me blind to the truth nobod wants to reveal