<Snipped quote by The Spectre>
Eh, I looked that up too, but who cares. It's a sick and wrong position to hold.
and I'm a glutton for punishment.
Discourse me daddy
>sick
>wrong
Uhhh, how?
<Snipped quote by The Spectre>
Eh, I looked that up too, but who cares. It's a sick and wrong position to hold.
and I'm a glutton for punishment.
Discourse me daddy
<Snipped quote by Didgeridont>
Wow, were you waiting all day to bust out that one, Edgy McCuck?
>wake up
>"damn, really sucks how our VP thinks you can electrocute gay people until they're straight"
>see if Roleplayer Guild is still a rank shit hole
>see this thread
>"damn, maybe electrocuting gay people is okay as long as we democratically choose to do so."
<Snipped quote by j8cob>
I am aware that he isn't simply his public persona, but the reality is that he was primarily known as his public persona. The "Guy from the Apprentice" narrative wasn't sewn from whole cloth in the last fifteen months by the media to smear a guy who had previously been seen as an Alan Greenspan type figure.
You go back six years ago when we didn't consider him a mostly political figure and you'd find people looking at him as that guy who builds flashy casinos with his name on it and yells at Gary Busey on television. Imma assume that most people haven't exactly read his book, for instance.
<Snipped quote by Didgeridont>
Well, first and foremost I think your reading of the situation between races isn't quite true. There are still racial divides in this country this is true, but it doesn't tell the whole story. I live in a pretty mixed working class area and, everyone here being part of the same regional class culture, we get along pretty damned naturally despite race. If I drive downtown into the ghetto, or conversely if a black neighbor or co-worker went to a small town in the hills, then yeh, there is problems. But speaking of the part of the city I live in, I have more in common with a black neighbor than I do with a white man from Beverly Hills.
And I agree, cultures should be allowed to change naturally. That's kind of what I am saying actually. What I have just described is my natural cultural condition, but your theory seems to assume it is invalid and that I and my neighbors need to be artificially segregated so that I experience my culture more in line with your idea with what it should be than what it actually is. Which is to say simply that I find your concept too bizarre and rigid to ever allow me or those around me to experience culture naturally. There would have to be a culture Gestapo around telling me what Didgeridont requires my culture to be. Historically some regimes have tried it, and historically it doesn't work. The Soviets tried to enforce a culture and the people rejected it a few generations later. Franco attempted the same thing in Spain and the people rejected it only a couple of generations later. Culture is a moving thing, and if you put it behind a dam it only cracks the dam and floods outward on it's own.
And the Roman Empire doesn't work as an example. In the Mediterranean, particularly the eastern half, they absorbed cultures that were decidedly unroman and allowed them to practice their culture, and even their religion, so long as they followed civic law and refrained from converting people to cults. These places Romanticized slowly through a natural process of cultural drift. They had divisive citizenship laws this is true, but as time went on citizenship laws, for your average person, mostly just affected where you sat on the tax base. It's in the decadence of the post-Severan collapse that they begin to hold Germanic tribes introduced into their borders at arms length instead of integrating them, dividing the Empire into increasingly competitive power bases in the last century until those power bases basically tear the thing apart. They couldn't have kept those barbarians out because... well, they tried, they simply couldn't afford to. But by holding them at arms length instead of integrating them, they created the conditions for the empire to fracture as those Germanic power bases became independent.
<Snipped quote by Didgeridont>
We've always done that though. You could take this argument and transpose it into the world of 1850's politics and, honestly, it would fit perfectly. Swap the Irish for the Mexicans and Papacy for moral degeneracy and wham bam, you've traveled into the past 150 years.
And we didn't smash ourselves together. You make it sound like the United States was some weird international particle collider experiment done from the very beginning as a purposeful attempt at multiculturalism, when reality is way more chaotic. Some people immigrated here on their own volition, others came here as refugees. Others didn't have a choice; they where either assimilated by conquest, or in the case of the black man, stolen from their rightful home. And this is history. This is how it has always worked in the entire world in every nation for all time. People move, borders shift, cultures change. You can't really draw a line around a group of people and say "This is a culture" because as soon as you do, it makes connections outside of the line, or it changes from within. To attempt to freeze a culture is absolutely futile.
<Snipped quote by Didgeridont>
And these things shift. The cultural values and morals of two or three generations ago are as foreign to me as the cultural values of many other nations.
The things you are talking about are way too fluid. I can tell pretty easily that I don't have your common goals, or your ideas about what is proper morality or laws. You'd have to use force to keep me, and many many other Americans, in line with your concepts of how things are supposed to be. At that point can you say your method is any more natural or cohesive than another other method? It seems to me if you have to use increased force to keep your "cohesion" then your "cohesion" is rather brittle.
<Snipped quote by Didgeridont>
The so-called "greatness" you want isn't that though. Your "greatness" focuses entirely around your oddly-constructed system of what you believe to be "great" and what you believe to be "degeneracy". In reality, neither should be supported or fought above all else. Class is the primary conflict that we need to focus on, not those damn ess-jay-doubleyews with their ( ( ( F E M I N I S M ) ) ).
<Snipped quote by Didgeridont>
I'm denying that your "greatness" even matters.
@Didgeridont
>muh redpill
Oh wow. Truly, you are the philosopher-kings of this generation. I tremble in fear of your superior IQ and pure nordic bloodline. Enlighten me, glorious ubermensch! Enlighten me with your artifact-riddled jpegs! You and your kind are truly the only independent and strong peoples remaining on this planet, what with your desire to be ruled by an eternal god-emperor and fixation on cuckold porn!
>We will preserve the things that made each nation in the world a great nation: borders, language, culture.
Spooky shit.