Avatar of Ellri
  • Last Seen: 3 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: Ellri
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 3731 (0.82 / day)
  • VMs: 5
  • Username history
    1. Ellri 12 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

7 yrs ago
Current Peace is a Lie, there is only Passion. Through Passion, I gain Strength. Through Strength, I gain Power. Through Power, I gain Victory. Through Victory, My Chains are Broken. The Force Shall Free Me.
3 likes
8 yrs ago
"Never was, never will be."
8 yrs ago
We find that our favorite damage type is collateral.
8 yrs ago
We do not corrupt mortals. We teach them enlightened self-interest.
8 yrs ago
Peace is a lie. There is only passion (for cookies).
2 likes

Bio

User has no interest in writing a bio yet.

Most Recent Posts

To cut a complex discussion short, its been decided on a GM level that right now there's already enough characters of "non-traditional" sexual preferences than is normal in a population. Rounding the player character population to the nearest thirty, one should expect roughly 15 of those to be female. Right now, there are 4-5 of those who have inclinations towards either playing with the same gender, or towards playing with both genders. That makes it roughly 27-33% of the female population.

But in the case now, the list of characters has 15 males and 11 females. So with 4-5 of those being bisexual or lesbian, it is not 27-33%, but 36.4-45.5%. Not exactly a normal level.

It is for this reason we'll not at this time have more characters of such preferences.

Granted, through all of this, its also important to note that romance between characters is not the primary focus of Aftermath. Sure, it might happen, but it doesn't have to. And it certainly doesn't have to be successful if it does happen. One or both characters in such a pairing might die, for example. Or someone (read: Darth Nyiss) could let Sish run freely. You never know what happens if he gets to do that. Or rather, you never know exactly who will be maimed and die.

On a more joyous note:

The opening post for the IC is rapidly growing forth. If all goes according to plan, it'll come up tomorrow, when we and Echo (and hopefully Fallen) are all online and awake.

----------------

@MonkeyBusiness
We can see from your sheet that you want your Jedi to be less experienced and less effective as a warrior. Thats not a bad thing in the current player crowd. We have a slight suggestion for change to her style. Rather than have her simply be inexperienced at wielding a lightsaber, have her be bad at fighting others with it, bad at duels. Instead, have her be fairly good at sending blaster bolts back to their owners and at treating the wounded. A true support role.

There’s no need for her to be trained to win battles on her own. Not all Jedi are suited for that. Instead, it would be logical for her to have been trained to ensure that the troops she serves with wins the battles. Do you like that idea?

Secondly, as a healer, its very likely that she spent some time training on H’Ratth, as that’s the primary academy for Jedi healers. That would allow her to know Lea a little too. Not too well, though. Lea never had all that many close friends.

Fallen’s additions
If she was bad at combat, Ellri’s suggestion works out well (both really) and I’ve already stated in his CS he likes the support and healing role anyway. There’s little reason his Padawan can’t take the same role as well. In fact, he would’ve insisted on it because it kept both out of the line of fire, allowing them to live longer. It also allows a different flavor too.
playing as him would break canon. you know that.
There are only a few restrictions on species:
Not Miraluka.
Speaks basic without technological help.
not an extremely obscure species.
Discovered in this era (3650s BBY).
not immortal or somesuch.

Feel free to drop by the IRC if you've got questions, @Catharyn
Its nice to see the entrants have plenty of time to finish their entries.

5. Send your entry to Terminal by April 30th.
Interesting sheet.

We'd give a full review, but we'd rather work on getting the IC semi-ready.
nah. it was an example. but a detailed foreplay is also potentially likely to either offend someone, like the adsense bots.
Its ok to write something akin to "And then they enthusiastically made love to each other", whereas describing exactly how they went about that process.
You don't want to know. Trust us.
isn't it better to make it so subtle he's halfway through the post before he notices? and then, 3/4 through, put something that would've been very beneficial for him to notice.

Excuses excuses.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet