If everyone's leaving, I'm going to take over by flooding it with anarchism, HYPER-capitalism, and socialism memes.
FTFY
If everyone's leaving, I'm going to take over by flooding it with anarchism, HYPER-capitalism, and socialism memes.
@Dynamo Frokane Wolfenstein isn't exactly making a statement other than "Nazis are bad and killing Nazis is fun". That people got upset that the game is about killing fake Nazis in a fake take on history was both hilarious and stupid. Far Cry 5 is very much using certain aspects of the current social and political climate to garner attention but then pretty much doing nothing with it other than correctly having some characters use terms like "libtards". It ruffled certain feathers because "Oh I'm killing white conservative Americans and I'm one of those uh oh" but it amounted to little other than white noise. I'm not giving Ubisoft any props for taking advantage of a certain climate but I am rolling my eyes that some reviewers can't get over the fact the game doesn't swing as hard in the direction they wanted it to.
I haven't played the new Wolfenstein sequel so if they do something other than 'Nazis bad, B.J. good' then that's news to me. But I'd also say that Wolfenstein: The New Order and by association The New Colossus are better written games than Far Cry 5 anyway.
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
How about this? I'm not in the mood to be snarky. So, I'm just going to speak frankly.
First. I want you to admit that you were wrong in your accusations made against Harbinger. For "being apart of" that certain thread locking. When I'm telling you straight up, he wasn't.
Second. You can claim, "hur-dur paranoid about people randomly sending unprovoked attacks at you. That's imaginary." So ignoring that this, is that. You've already admitted such to me. So I know, that you know you're talking out of your rear-end. You said yourself, you were encouraging and fueling such people and their attacks on me.
So claiming, it was only due by a single person and their own actions. (ignoring I still have posts that prove that wrong, in an instance.) You yourself don't think that. Unless you've changed your mind? <.< (I can't care less.)

No, that's not all you did. You compared his discussion with Penny to Andy. On topics that weren't comparable. And even then, my only point was you aren't adding anything substantive arguing this. I was discussing with Harbinger and Poohead without any problems here.