Avatar of Gwynbleidd
  • Last Seen: 4 yrs ago
  • Joined: 10 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1247 (0.33 / day)
  • VMs: 3
  • Username history
    1. Gwynbleidd 6 yrs ago
    2. █████████ 10 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by catchamber>

Surely some people should be hated. Osama bin Laden wait he's dead, um.... people who wear socks with sandals. ISIS, MS13, Al Shabaab know what let's just stick with sock-sandal bastards. Like real talk, there's gotta come a point, right?


Hey hey hey HEY!

Leave the damn shoebies alone.
@NuttsnBolts

Looks like rain...

(Lol, love it, and thank you!)
I've never changed this name, but I think it's time to move on. Fare thee well to the darkly-tinted winds of ominous intent!

So, yeah, I'd be greatly appreciative if my name could be changed from "Dark Wind" to "Gwynbleidd"

Time to go full Witcher lol
-snip-


Net Neutrality is a lie. The name of Net Neutrality "sounds good" to you, me, or any other average person. But, hey, so does 'The Patriot Act' and the 'National Defense Authorization Act'. Didn't mean such things were not also severely unconstitutional, sliced into citizens' personal privacy, and helped provide a platform for the growth of central government to the absurd proportions we have today.

It's preferable to have less regulation and smaller government.
Don't y'all just love how NeoMcCarthyism is rattling federal US politics?


It's an entertaining year, that's for sure.
Wait, you mean Muller isn't investigating President Nixon?!


I know! Shocker.

Apparently Muller is working on it.

And we'll see where he gets to, if anywhere.

The very best you can say is that Trump's campaign had sketchy Russian connections (Mannafort) and sketchy Turkish connections (Flynn). It is easy to imagine that Trump, a relative new comer to the political stage wouldn't be aware, or at least aware of how problematic, this could become. I think its completely understandable that his legal counsel is ultra cautious. I haven't really been following the story but I haven't heard they are obstructing.

One possible path of many. Or, there's nothing really to any of this and there was no collusion; also a possible path.

@The Harbinger of Ferocity I'll refer you to Penny's quote

Not only that, but the question that remains is, if Trump or his staff staff never had anything to hide, how come they never give a full story? Like the meeting with Donald Jr. and the the Russian lawyer. Why did it take weeks for them to admit it was not just him, but in fact 8 people in the room? It took multiple occasions of questions and reports to find out something Donald Jr. could have just outright stated. This is a consistent trend within the Trump administration. If they do have nothing to hide, they're doing a poor job at it.

The implication is that Watergate is equivalent to this. They are different cases, with a different set of facts, so in the end bringing up Watergate doesn't have much relevance other than that yes, investigations can take a long time.

Also, when you're involved in those sort of legal situation: you don't often say much because people have accidentally incriminated themselves before when they didn't do anything. There is reason for saying this, or not saying that.

In the end, this doesn't matter so much because nothing to date has been released on the Trump, Jr. meeting to prove, well, anything. As of this moment, there is no proof of information having exchanged hands.

ADDED: We're getting into speculation of motives and what not here, and that's a shady as fuck place to get because once again, we're like blind people grasping about in the dark. The focus should be: crime committed? crime not committed? prove it.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet