Avatar of j8cob
  • Last Seen: 26 days ago
  • Old Guild Username: j8cob
  • Joined: 10 yrs ago
  • Posts: 2465 (0.66 / day)
  • VMs: 3
  • Username history
    1. j8cob 10 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:
      Most recent → Avatar of Auz Auz

Status

Recent Statuses

4 yrs ago
Current All the guy did was change his pic to a swastika, say some entry-level /pol/ bytes, and changed his bio to basic slurs.
4 yrs ago
You know exactly who.
1 like
4 yrs ago
I don't know why we can't blast both zoophiles and pedophiles at the same time. Two birds one stone.
7 likes
4 yrs ago
idk who needs to hear this but if you like women then you're gay, no ifs ands or buts
4 likes
5 yrs ago
I'm back.
1 like

Bio

Bitch, I'm the best.

Most Recent Posts



Look, I finished it tonight.
@j8cob Yes, on the banlist.


Sweet!
I assume I get a reserved slot. ;)
So we now have some good evidence of Trump Money Laundering and 2017 was one of the top 3 hottest years ever recorded.


>listening to the Fusion GPS shit and citing it as actual evidence of anything despite it being known as an almost complete fabrication paid for by opposition

Really activates my almonds.
I can confirm that @Altered Tundra is definitely not a Nazi apologist. He's a leftie. And he's right. All the ignorance I've seen in this thread hasn't been from those who do discriminate gender or defend those who do. It's been from those stubbornly against it that have only looked at the issue with the narrowest perspective possible.
The real best part is where y'all completely disregard the people "discriminating" and don't even attempt to look at the subject from a different perspective to form a real opinion.

"This person says he doesn't want to roleplay with women. Surely they're just a sexist pig."
<Snipped quote by j8cob>

Sorry but discriminating someone because their writing style doesn't match yours is not even close to the same as discriminating based one gender and nothing you say is going to change that.


How is it not? Its literally discriminating and odds are its far stricter too. I've discriminated against people for petty shit and you've probably done the same.

Let's say there's some young girl who wants to do a 1x1 but only with other girls because she's uncomfortable with talking to boys both online and in the real world. She can make that choice and is morally sound in doing so. Discriminating to your own benefit is natural and often subconscious. How would she be able to confirm that she only works with other girls? Fuck if I know, probably no way to do it. But that doesn't mean she can't set that standard.

Now let's say there's a young man who also wants to do a 1x1 but only with women because he wants to smut and is uncomfortable with the idea of making erotic stuff with another man. He's remaining within his comfort zone and doesn't deserve criticism for it anymore than the girl from my first example.

You're adopting a really narrow worldview where these people are automatically sexists or terrible people or something and aren't just regular people themselves. Their opinions matter just as much as anyone else's, and when it comes to how they want to roleplay then their opinions matter even more than yours do.
<Snipped quote by j8cob>

Once again, I'm not saying people CAN'T, I'm saying they SHOULDN'T.

Please explain to me how putting "I lack confidence in my sexuality so I only want to RP with girls" actually guarantees that all your partners will be girls. You can't claim that this is a method of reducing your obligation when you can't actually stop dudes from messaging you and pretending they are girls. It doesn't work like that, friend.


I didn't say it was smart, but there's nothing wrong with it. The fact that the site is broken into sections based on writing skill already proves that you can and should discriminate with who you roleplay with.
<Snipped quote by j8cob>
Not really. It is two different conflating issues. I disagree that it is acceptable to discriminate based on sex, gender, orientation, race, or anything mentioned prior. In fact, I believe Drache touched on this before. Obviously you disagree, but I don’t feel there is a rather strong argument for it being acceptable; but morals are like ethics – fluid and determinant on the individual. Such is why it is difficult to ever make an objective determination based on it.

<Snipped quote by Hillan>
Entirely agree.


Morality is subjective, glad you understand that. That's why you should understand that it can't be morally unacceptable to discriminate in your RP partners by any metric. You can discriminate on skill and on roleplaying history, you can discriminate on anything you want. Nothing stopping you and you already do it anyways to a certain degree.
<Snipped quote by j8cob>

Then you're being sexist. I guess that's okay.


Nobody has any obligation, neither morally nor legally, to associate with anyone else. I have no obligation to like everyone, you have no obligation to interact with everyone, the guy down the street has no obligation to talk to everyone. It's not sexist, its an observation. People can, and will, do what they want.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet