Avatar of Lady Seraphina
  • Last Seen: 10 mos ago
  • Joined: 12 yrs ago
  • Posts: 4837 (1.07 / day)
  • VMs: 2
  • Username history
    1. Lady Seraphina 5 yrs ago
    2. █████████████████ 12 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Star Trek writers seem to do a terrible job at making Section 31 the bad guys.


I mean they operated very much under the "The ends justify the means" mentality but nothing they did I think was really wrong. Though if I were them I'd have arranged for the cure to the metagenic virus to be offered to the Founders in exchange for surrender. Would have saved a really lot of lives if they'd done that before marching on Cardassia.
I meant that he's not from a video game. The Witcher game series is based off of a series of novels.


I did not know that. In any case characters from a game like that would be fine. The rule is there to prevent people bringing in pop culture icons that were popular enough to have a really lame video game made for them.
That does sound pretty cool. And I know a little bit about DS9 since I used to have a Star Trek strategy game for my PS2. I remember playing the hell out of that game with my dad. Always had to work together with him because I absolutely sucked at overall strategy but would absolutely destroy everyone in combat while my dad had the opposite problem.


Just remember no matter how evil they make Section 31 look they were totally justified in there actions the entire time.
But...none of the characters we're playing are OCs. Except for technically the Guardian, who I play.


I put a note in the OP that says no character's who's games are based on secondary source material. To prevent people bringing characters from games based on whatever movie is popular right now.

Hai. Tfw no geralt of rivia because he's not an original character.

It's just as well, geralt is frickin' OP...


I wasn't aware that the Witcher was based on something?
Yey. Will think on character then make application.


Yay a friendly face.
So that's where that picture came from. And yeah, I guess Wrath of Khan is the only good Star Trek thing I've ever seen. I guess that's why I've always preferred Star Wars over Star Trek. Though that might also be a result of me preferring big fleet on fleet/army on army fights than ship on ship/man on man fights.


Watch Deep Space 9. It covers a four year war between the Federation and its allies and an invading force called the Dominion who've co-opted the Cardassian Empire as there base against the Alpha Quadrant. It's got a fair amount of fleet on fleet battles.
@Suku At night a fuck ton of stalchildren (skeletons) but during the day just a half dozen of these scattered about:

<Snipped quote by Prince of Seraphs>

That sounds like one of those things that you need to see for yourself, but that still sounds pretty fucked up.

And yeah, that sounds like some really bullshit arbitrary writing, but meh.


Progression of lizarding:





Were the intervals really that short? Always felt longer.


I think it was more like two minutes but since we're in a medium were time usually moves a bit faster I'm pushing it.
I've only ever seen the original series, the original movies, the movies for Next Gen, and the new reboot movies so I've got no idea what you guys are talking about.


So you've seen literally all of the bad Star Trek? (except for Wrath of Khan)
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet