Avatar of Raineh Daze

Status

Recent Statuses

6 mos ago
Current i'm not sure the appropriate use of an OLED TV is to play random scenic train videos but here we are
2 likes
7 mos ago
swish
8 mos ago
Being truly on my own is a bit of a weird feeling. It's never really happened.
2 likes
9 mos ago
Let it never be said that sometimes extreme brevity isn't the most appropriate post, though. Everything is a tool.
2 likes
12 mos ago
a loaf is a surprisingly hard thing to make
2 likes

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Demous said
Stare? It clearly says started!


Because you clearly changed it. :p
It would be her first day coming soon, joining in the middle of the school year.


We're still on day one.
Fabricant451 said
It's a desert. A brown desert. A big ol' brown desert with giant bugs. I liked New Vegas' setting more than D.C.If only because I didn't have to go into subway tunnels and wonder why it looked like the bombs had only recently dropped and not centuries after the fact the whole time. And then I met the Brotherhood of Steel and evil super mutants and I just stopped caring about Fallout 3. And then I played Skyrim and quit that after two hours because Bethesda's strength is not in making interesting quests or things to explore. Also I will forever hate Fallout 3 for the bullshit ending and how they 'fixed' it but in the process had Ron Perlman essentially tell the player that they were a huge coward for being smarter than the game. I kind of give Obsidian all the praise in the world because they're the studio that came from the studio that made Planescape: Torment. Now that's a goddamn game.


I dunno, the side quests and random things are well written. :p

Also no starting off effectively unable to use half the weapon types in the game, including everything fun. >_>
Fabricant451 said
That is because Obsidian makes better games than Bethesda.


I disagree because I can at least get some distance into Bethesda games without dying of boredom. NV suffers from horrible pacing like that.

Also, there is a colour in the world that isn't a muted brown shade. D<
-Has all the DLC for Skyrim, NV, and Fallout 3... on a shelf in front of me.-

Oblivion and Morrowind are 400 miles away.

... can't get into the Fallout games because the low levels are reaaaaaaaaaaaally boring so I never get to the fun or interesting stuff. Also, too much brown. I'm sick of brown.
Silver Fox said
I have a little memory but I believe he was a asshole to other races. Nords were fine but poor you if you weren't. Dunmer's cries for help were ignored as well as the Khajiit and Argonians were strictly banned from his city.And only after death does he realize "Oh maybe fighting a war isn't the best idea since there is a giant dragon going to swallow the world and his war is only making it stronger."But yeah he or his followers didn't much impress me. Sure I didn't want to go with the imperials either since they were going to chop my head. I kinda wanted a middle but eh xD I just end avoided both sides


Well, Ulfric's perfectly fine with a non-Nord joining his war.

He's kind of a bad ruler, though, seeing as how most of his time ruling has been spent imprisoned, fighting a civil war, or dealing with the Forsworn. Really, I'm not sure he has a damn idea what goes on in his city. <_<
Ulfric doesn't seem to be an asshole. His followers, however...
El_Tigre said
@Fabricant: I apologize if I jumped to the "Intolerant" defense a tad quickly. Though as I saw it I had JUST barely posted they character and there had already been 4 (or 5, cant remember) post about the characters disorder made them uncomfortable and felt as if they labeled the character before actually reading her content and actually understanding what the character was all about. If you notice the moment I read all their responses I changed the unsettling information.Then I voiced my concern that their reaction seemed a bit intolerant because they pounced on the character the second it was made because of a disorder (I have proven with several sources) that is very similar to a disorder in real life.


Nothing is 'proven'. You repeatedly selected or linked the wrong thing, started off with the wrong term, and had an inaccurate description. What this looks like is revisionism; you're trying to claim after the fact that you meant something else entirely. That is why I didn't assume the plural was accidental: you'd given every indication that it was likely to be fully intentional and the result of not knowing what you're talking about. If you did mean what you claim in the first place, then you would have just linked or quoted the relevant section to start with.
El_Tigre said
"True Gonadal Intersex: Here the person must have both ovarian and testicular tissue. This may be in the same gonad (an ovotestis), or the person might have one ovary and one testis. .." Quoted I still don't see where I am wrong.Edit: If you want to make your point better understand you should try explaining your thoughts and reasoning. Instead of saying few words that aren't very pointed and direct. It would make this discussion a lot more clear on both sides.


You've got plurals involved. Read your quote again. >_>

Anyway, I have no desire to be in the same thread as you. Glad you dropped out the first time, as that at least meant getting to enjoy it for a while. I'm done with this.
In the history there was only one mention of her condition which I believe said "She was born with both male and female genitalia" which should have been "Born with both male and female sex organs" which refer to her having both testicles and ovaries within her


No, that part.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet