@Dynamo Frokane according to Black Hitler the term 'gay' is a European social construct created by cave dwelling neanderthals and is racist against black people. lol you don't hate black people do you?
@SleepingSilence I think that your comments about SJWs arent too different from my comments about libertarians, you dont agree with the movement so you poke fun at them. You can say the majority of SJWs are rude and calling 'everyone' racist/sexist whatever but the reality is you havent met enough SJWs to make a overall comment on their behavior as I haven't met enough libertarians to justify saying they are ALL the way I say they are, but I'm generalizing to point out an issue with the ideology. And some libertarians do consider themselves centrist, they refer to themselves being in 'the middle' of left and right wing politics.
<Snipped quote by Weird Tales>
Some libertarians are meninist/MRA types, feminism clashes with their idea of freedom. Now please summarize why I am and SJW and how you've come to this conclusion, because you seem like you are just trying to label anything that doesn't agree with you as an SJW.
I have no idea who Angela or this tumblr writer is, I dont follow tumblr as much as you do it seems.
And yeah, saying I'm insecure is just a dumb ad-hominem attack that I wont justify with a response, troll harder Andy Rand.
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
It certainly does appear that way, I mean you hate a video game because you think it MAY of created a few extra libertarians. That just seems too extreme for your dislike to be a mild annoyance level. XD And yes you're correct passion isn't always translate to usefulness. But, its a hell of a lot better than people who do the opposite.
I don't like Anita Sarkseeian because she HAS NO passion, she doesn't care about video games, she doesn't play them. She has no passion in what she does. Her goal is to make money. She scammed all of her supports out of money. Disregarding her opinions, she's not a good person. I may dislike Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. But I do understand the difference between Sanders genuine desire to improve the world, how he sees it, and Hillary wanting her foundation to have more press. It reminds me of a debate between The Young Turks and Sam Harris. Where Sam Harris had to explain 2+2=5 is mathematically more correct, than 2+2=100. TYT couldn't grasp the idea, and said no both were equally wrong. I think that's kind of where we are right now.
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
Once again, I must say. A lot of SJW's (at least far far more of them.) Speak very rudely and aggressively to others, I mean when literally everyone is sexist,racist,homophobic,transphobic,ablest and god knows what else...is their main overall message. How CAN you say something that outrageous, in a polite manner?
That is false. Libertarians DO NOT, claim they are centrist. Their economy values may lean right or left. But it usually always means that most of their social views are liberal. Independents and Moderates make those claims, and yes usually most of time...no one is "in the center". And Libertarians do not equal Anarchists. I mean you're dislike seems to be from lack of knowledge of them, forgive me.
Calling them a bunch of names, also does not tend to show that you don't hate a group, because demonizing an entire group seems quite hateful to me. They also don't hate roads. Like that's someone I simply cannot understand saying with a straight face. Or saying meninist or race revisionist for that matter...-.-
I mean despite that people laugh and say "HA you think without a shit load of people FORCING you to spend money, that people would WILLINGLY give THEIR MONEY? To people who have ideas? OR even give money for their medical bills that aren't theirs. HAHAHAHA. Who would even?" *shows them kickstarter and gofundme and how fricking successful it is* >.> I mean seriously...most people will want roads...so people will pay for upkeep of those roads. (And no political system is perfect and its bound to have some kind of flaw...)
So question, do you want guns banned? Because that is absolutely not a centrist belief. Most Leftists and democrats don't even support that here.
<Snipped quote by Vilageidiotx>
Their are certain Libertarians do seem to actually be the "Give me drugs" party. Where that's the only issue they care about. But it's certainly not the majority. And it also seems to be a US only thing. At the same time, you don't have to do something to think it shouldn't try to be banned and forced out of people's hand. (their's a lot of gray area here, and its kind of hard to debate. Without going on forever. >.>)
Part 2: It also seems like such a broad bizarre generalization, it would be like saying Ferngully created Liberals or Call of Duty created right wingers. (Please don't make the argument for either or I'll get very sad.)
<Snipped quote by Weird Tales>
Also you brought up something interest I wanted to comment on. I'd like to agree with you that people should stop taking words so seriously. If they were called white they shouldn't get pissed they should feel apathetic at worst. Like I get people using words to hurt and verbal abuse is still a thing, but people take getting offensive to words a little too far...
I'd argue america is basically the only nation that over complicates race and gender and things that should be pretty fucking easy to figure out while at least I bet it started from here...Because of the very loud minority, though now the U.K has 71 genders apparently exist now and I honestly would be surprised if it only got more and more extreme in upcoming years, like people laugh at otherkin now but just wait humans will claim their different species, and it will be taken seriously...eventually it WILL happen.
I actually don't think you should be "PROUD" of something you have no control over, why should I be happy I'm white? I didn't achieve it. I just am. Race, Gender etc. It's not something you should ever feel ashamed for of course...but it also shouldn't really matter. Religion (or lack thereof) is a choice...so maybe you could feel some kind of achievement. Though that's debatable.
@Vilageidiotx@Dinh AaronMk it created libertarians BECAUSE of the attack on the ideology. They were united under fire. Sort of how you saw more psuedo intellectual creationists pop up after richard dawkins got popular.