Avatar of BBeast

Status

Recent Statuses

5 yrs ago
Current I'm now a professional physicist. Isn't that awesome?
6 likes
6 yrs ago
Exams are done! I'm free!
2 likes
6 yrs ago
"Life is complex - it has real and imaginary parts."
2 likes
7 yrs ago
Science doesn't rest
7 yrs ago
Reason Reified, Lord Logiker, Sciencomancer Superbus

Bio

I am a Roleplayer with an interest in science fiction and fantasy, with a preference for Casual. I have been roleplaying for several years, and have even taken a stab at running a few RPs.

Outside the Guild, I am an Australian science student, gamer, musician and roleplayer (that's right, IRL too).


Most Recent Posts

I have some concerns about the pacing for the first few Turns in Divinus Lite. To reach Level 4, you have to spend 12 Might. This means characters won't reach full godhood until part way through Turn 3. Once the world is well established, this is not a problem, but at the start the world is mostly formless. It will take until Turn 3 for them to Level Up enough to create sentient life.

We can speed up the start of the game by allowing the first batch of gods (i.e. those who join during Turn 1) to start at Level 3. They will then spend their allocated 6 Might, and if they didn't spend it on Portfolios or Holy Sites then they will reach Level 4. Thus, at the start of Turn 2, people can start making sentient life.

Possibly, we can extend this so that gods who start at Turn 2 start at Level 2 (since those players were just a little bit late), then all new gods from Turn 3 onwards start at Level 1.

The 'New Gods and Divine Offspring' section should probably mention that new gods created in such a manner should be played by different players unless you have received express GM approval (unless you wish to rule otherwise). And mention that new players are encouraged (but not required) to find existing players to be their divine parents.

Under 'Might', we should add to the table how much it costs to do the actions we associate with Freepoints. We should also add how much it takes to create living creatures: say, 0.25 MP for a simple or mundane species (i.e. not sentient and no powerful abilities or properties); 1 MP for a sentient or extraordinary species.

The 'Fate and Mater Lei' section should probably be updated to include Mater Lei's role in bringing in new gods. And unless you wish to continue with the 'Old Universe destroyed' story, you should probably drop mention of the Old Universe and remove the 'post-Apocalyptic' tag from the top of the OP.

In 'Heroes', don't forget to fill in my placeholder definition of 'harm' and remove the "Costs can be adjusted and new factors added. This is just a sample." line.

In an established RP like Mk.II, I think we can do away with it at this point, especially as I'm no longer a GM. If I've jumped the gun by using Prestige in that last post, Termite can edit ^^'

That's cool. We can start working on the transition.
I observe that Kho has already started using Prestige instead of Khookies.
Without accounting for Holy Sites, a player receives Level+3 Might per Turn. Over two Turns they gain 2*Level+6 Might. If we are encouraging spending in Divinus Lite, then they should spend most of that. Since it takes 2*Level Might spent to Level up, a player should reliably level up every 2 Turns or less unless they save for a Holy Site (after which they'll Level up faster).

Also, I've devised a system for determining the rewards from Hero quests. A quest starts out granting zero Khookies/Prestige. You then add to the reward some amount based on the risks faced by the Hero and consequences suffered. You also add amounts based on time taken and roleplaying elements such as collaboration. These criteria need to be as close to objective as reasonably possible, to minimise GM oversight.

For example:

The amount of Khookies/Prestige granted for completing a quest is increased by the following factors.
Risk factor
(Risk factors do not stack; take the highest value one only if multiple apply.)
- The Hero risked mild harm. (1 Khookies)
- The Hero suffered mild harm. (2 Khookies)
- The Hero risked moderate harm. (4 Khookies)
- The Hero suffered moderate harm. (8 Khookies)
- The Hero risked severe harm. (6 Khookies)
- The Hero suffered severe harm. (12 Khookies)
<<Definitions of mild, moderate and severe harm here. 'Harm' is to be defined quite broadly. Severity is to be judged by how much of a setback it is and what the probability of that setback is. Mild would probably be things the Hero could easily recover from. Severe would be permanent (or potentially permanent) and significant losses.>>
If no risk factors apply, a Hero can not gain any Khookies from the quest.

Other factors
- The Hero collaborated with characters from other players to complete the quest. (+5 Khookies)
- The quest took more than one post of continued effort to complete. (+2 Khookies)
- The quest took more than one Turn of continued effort to complete. (+8 Khookies)


Costs can be adjusted and new factors added. This is just a sample.

Note that this system will likely provide different rewards for different Heroes. If the quest is to 'Protect a village from a horde of Ashlings', then a powerful combat Hero like Ventus might receive little or no reward from such a quest, while a less strong Hero like Belvast could receive significant rewards for the quest.

Also, where we say that a quest can be completed multiple times, add in the phrase "if it makes sense to do so." Quests such as 'Protect a village from a horde of Ashlings' or 'Convert a group of people to Chirality' makes sense to be repeated. A quest like 'Kill Grot' or 'Gather Death's Shards under the World Mountain' can only be completed once.

Also, I support the idea raised by Termite of changing the name of Khookies to Prestige. With the quest system, this makes extra sense. Of course, if Kho is running the place, he might be inclined to keep the pun.

P.S. I have been assuming that Might spent carries over Turns when it comes to levelling up. It would be counter-productive not to.

Also, remember in your expenditure tables that gaining Portfolios and Domains also does not count. I think we should also omit Might spent to Level Up Heroes from the list of activities which contribute to your Level.
I just crunched some numbers. Having cost to Level up equal to your Level allows for really regular levelling (i.e. every Turn). Since in this system, players would passively Level Up without investing Might into it, this is quite fast. I would agree with Termite that the 'cost' should be twice your current Level. This would mean levelling on average once every two Turns.
Also, for levelling up, how about you can Level Up only if you have spent at least 1 MP Might equal to your current level on something else since your last Level Up (including at the start of the game).


This work?


The trouble is that will more than double the amount of Might it takes to Level Up at the current proposed costs.

A suggestion: our goal with this is to encourage Might spending on useful stuff rather than on power-levelling, yes? What if, instead of spending Might to increase your Level, you Level Up whenever you spend your Level's worth of Might on things other than Holy Sites, Domains and Portfolios? (The exact quantity of spending needed could be rebalanced, of course.)
I'll be honest, I have little idea about how the Free Section works. I haven't had time to explore. But I agree that current Divinus is definitely Advanced material.

Btw, I definitely do not have time to GM this new version. I've been procrastinating for the past 6 hours simply talking about this when I should probably be doing work.
<Snipped quote by BBeast>

Haven't read the draft OP yet, but I'd like to raise that some gods will play cautiously with their Might simply because they don't know when they next need it, even if they're active, in which case we shouldn't punish them for actively choosing to stay quiet. Also, losing excess Might at the end of the turn is also incentive to try and level up with your spare Might if you have it, and it's enough.

I think the Might cap / Might expiry should be merged into a simple cap = 2 x Might per turn rule. That way you can still save a little, if you feel like playing that way.

I also would still like to keep the level-up-available-if-Might-is-spent rule, amended somehow, maybe so that Might spent on levelling doesn't count.


You raise a good point. It's hard to know when to save for a rainy day and when to spend all your Might. With the cap on expenditure on single items, saving up for super-weapons is no longer a concern.

I propose that the Might cap should either be 1.5 * Might per Turn, to encourage people to spend at least some Might during each Turn; or 2 * (Level+3), which is the Might per Turn ignoring Holy Sites (so Holy Sites can boost your generation, but not beyond the capacity allowed by your Level).

Also, for levelling up, how about you can Level Up only if you have spent at least 1 MP on something else since your last Level Up (including at the start of the game).
@Antarctic Termite has a point. Demigods work as a good probation system with the level to ascend scaled back as proposed, but whether such a system is necessary at all in a Free Section RP is debatable. Depends whether we want to have a consistent committed player base or allow drop-in-drop-out play.

If we allow drop-in-drop-out play, then we would need to encode some mechanism to remove inactive gods from the pool and free up their Portfolios for other players. Perhaps not doing anything IC for, say, 2 consecutive Turns without leave of absence results in that god's power fading away, such that their Portfolios can be taken, and they lose influence over worshippers.
In line with BBeast's suggestion that 'the threshold for ascending to godhood can be reduced to, say, Level 6 or 7', I've edited it in the proposed OP to level 6.


It largely depends on how many Turns we want to make the new players wait. Getting to Level 6 takes 16 Might. Power levelling gets you there in 4 Turns with 9 MP to spare on other expenses along the way. If you get 1000 worshippers by the end of your first Turn, you can cut it down to 3 Turns. If we lower the limit to Level 5, then we reduce the time it takes by another Turn. Although the time taken by a Level 6 threshold seems adequate (especially considering that Turns should be faster).
A more sandboxy and free feel as well as freedom from a vague backstory that I'm not all that fond of. GM intervention would be a last resort in my idealized vision; for the most part, if one god is being overly destructive and a dick, I think that it should fall to the other players to stop him. If nobody does, then he rampages and run loose. Only if the story is utterly stagnating or something extreme happens (ie alliance of chaos gods threatening to scour all of creation) should some ex nihilo event need to happen with GM intervention. Because we'd plan on trying to avoid the need for such things, I dislike having the Primordial Beings primed and loomed over us like a bucket of water rigged to the top of a door.


I can see the appeal there. As a player driven RP, it should be up to the players to keep the other player characters in check. This is, indeed, what we have been doing all along. In that sense, the Primordials are unnecessary.

As for your other points, I think you have identified the key question: what is to be the design philosophy behind Divinus Lite (or whatever we end up calling it)? Do we want to stay true to the style of the original Divinus, with Gods being transcendental beings who predate all mortal civilisation in a fully customised world? Or do we want to create a different flavour of god RP, as you are suggesting? Ultimately, these choices come down to whoever actually decides to run such an RP.


On a more mechanical thought: for Divinus Lite, I think we can streamline the ascension from Demigodhood to Godhood more (P.S. Termite already pointed out that this needed doing). As it stands, there are two tiers of players: those who were here at the start, and those who came later. This helps maintain consistency in the Divinus IC canon, where it would be weird if new fully-fledged gods kept appearing and disappearing, but it can be relaxed in Divinus Lite. A Demigod can basically be considered as a probationary god in this context. If the player sticks around for long enough to level up a bit, then they receive the privilege of becoming a full god. On the other hand, if the player drops out soon after joining, then only a demigod is lost and not a proper god. This probationary period allows the character to smoothly enter into the pantheon.

Perhaps the threshold for ascending to godhood can be reduced to, say, Level 6 or 7. We can retain the Might gained from worshippers, since obtaining worshippers requires roleplaying and that should be encouraged especially in the newer players.


Also, all this talk of Divinus Lite has made me start thinking about how it could be adapted to a tabletop setting...
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet