<Snipped quote by Etcetera>
-Soren- What do you mean?
If a system cannot be stopped at an individual point, all points may be brought to a close.
Etcetera Member
Vector
- Last Seen: 15 days ago
- Joined: 12 yrs ago
- Posts: 17454 (3.84 / day)
- VMs: 0
-
Username history
- Etcetera 12 yrs ago
-
Latest 10 profile visitors:
-
Most recent →
The World,
Artifact,
darkred,
Not a Sayan,
JFK,
xVampire3go,
Scrawl Banditta,
ppppppp,
Tank O The Lake,
Chiliarchy
Status
User has no status, yet
Bio
User has no bio, yet
Most Recent Posts
If a system cannot be stopped at an individual point, all points may be brought to a close.
<Snipped quote by Etcetera>
-Soren- In that case, the first action we use could be tailored to work if a rule were changed for another action.
-Ruby- That would be kind of complicated.
-You said it!
-Soren- Why not two actions, then? Invalidating one guarantees the other to work.
The whole system may be shut down.
<Snipped quote by Etcetera>
-Ruby- Why?
There are several reasons, the most pressing being the manipulation of either backups before they are activated or after.
Hey David, skoipe.
I'm at school =/
Calculus test. I'll be back later.
<Snipped quote by Etcetera>
Do you have any ideas for going about it?
-Soren- Maybe we could try one action, and then account for the rule changes that make most sense with other, otherwise useless actions. If the first action would do what we want, then Seth is forced to change it, and then one of our other actions will take effect.
Hm. A backup system initially appears to be deficient.
<Snipped quote by Etcetera>
-Ruby- If you say so. What do you think of Sven's idea?
They are decent concepts.
<Snipped quote by Etcetera>
Yeah.
Yep...
<Snipped quote by Etcetera>
Mhm.
Ah; that makes more sense.
<Snipped quote by Etcetera>
Mhm.
Two semesters of Calculus AB, right?
<Snipped quote by Etcetera>
Anti derivatives
Just now?
© 2007-2026