Avatar of Foster

Status

Recent Statuses

11 days ago
Current A roleplay not for the timid: "The quest to restore the abandoned Waffle House"
4 likes
1 mo ago
I do agree with Yandere's sentiment that words not wording workingly do be a problem this time of year.
1 mo ago
Scratch that, place your bets on polymarket.
1 mo ago
Looks like I'll be working on memorial day weekend. And no, this does not mean place any bets on polymarket.
3 mos ago
due to a typo on my part I was nearly convinced I owed the IRS nearly $3000 in excess taxes this year.
5 likes

Bio

-There will be delays in replies. Largely due to working overtime, voluntary obligations; other RPs and online-things may compete for my attention.

'Bout me:
Started RPing (badly) back in '05, mostly doing nation-RPs with an emphasis on technology and strategy, later edging out to character-espionage and military-tactics before doing "less serious" character roleplays that were outside of the 2005-2008 continuity.

That's when I went to Dead-Frontier, and found the RP community there, joined a clan, did some pretty good roleplays and pretty much loosened-up my online-personality. When the clan-leader decided to move her RPs here, most of the clan followed.

Took a course in technical-writing back in '08, so now I may sometimes use the semicolon correctly.

In 2010 I dusted off the old nation-RP continuity I had, doing a few hetelia-esque RP-shenanigans there..

RP-Habbits: I tend to geek-out on little technical-details, and sometimes infer how those details would impact the background of the roleplay. Great for world-building, not so great when you had a perfectly good plotline and I just MacGyver it off the rails (though I usually er to the side of amusement, sometimes it creates very grim side-stories).

Most Recent Posts

banned for portraying master-chief as a xenophobic racist that doth commit intergalactic genocide.

Why can't he be more cute and cuddly?

<--- Yes, that avatar does in fact move
Will get on that NVA fellow...

Meanwhile, relevant thing on the progression and escalation of small-arms in Vietnam?

RPG-7s had just begun being adopted, although B-40 and RPG-2 rockets were still available (but they sucked p. hard in comparisson)
Ohai
Well, that's enough.

Before I start writing though, what would you guys be interested in:

A. Highly lethal small-scale combat situations requiring new characters thanks to casualties.

B. Changing theatres of war/time periods within the war (perhaps even different types of soldiers, maybe even going PAVN) requiring new characters.

C. Something else?

B, differnt theaters, POVs and whatnot... Perhaps allowing us to see some of our own characters from the perspective of other units.

Such as starting with french and Viet Minh units, then to when the USMC started showing still armed with M14s in their "policing action" (1965, Operation Starlite), then to the VC efforts... then double-track to the rough-puffs with a few ARVN NCOs as instructors and revisit some surviving 'old timers' in the USMC part (1966-1967)...

And the roil it all down to Hue in '68.
Funny thing is... George McCarthy happens to be the name of a tanker from A Company of 192nd Tank Brigade from Wisconsin.


The Mayguez incident was... *Military intellegence failure intensifies*

OTOH, we now know that it's a bad idea to drop a bomb known to make a 100 meter wide crater on 200 meter long island with friendlies still on it.

Anyways, now for a pep-talk

tech-trivia: Why Americans loved napalm: Napalm bombs, unlike high explosive, had no significant blast. Meaning 'danger close' was much closer-in, and was often utilized to counter the communist tendancy to 'hug' US units, allowing an overwhelmed position to break contact or reconsolidate a defensive position.

It was also of immesnly greater psychological value.

And it utterly wrecked VC tunnels.
Banned for not accepting your new pet-name (even though it kinda sucks, and @FreeElk should get working on a better one, like Covfefe.)
I'll see about getting one more person.

I should have kept up with this a lot more, oh dear.

In any case, I probably know very little about Vietnam- my relatives are European and therefore were more involved in avoiding communist secret police, and even the compulsory service didn't send them off to any theaters. I'll do some research for the RP, definitely.

-Vietnam was a cluster-crap that makes the Ukrainian civil war look simple and easily resolved. But in this thing even direct military intervention by major global powers just seemed to make the situation worse.
>But for the most part, if they shot at you, they were either enemy, or really dumb friendlies.

General US strategy/goal was to make sure Vietnam was "anything but a communist state" as per the policy of containment
-US Army approach to victory was to seek a series of decisive victories (according to paper), and attrition.
-USMC's approach was to generally just teach the locals how to handle the shit that was very obviously going to roll their way the moment they pulled out (see also: Sino-Vietnam war and Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia to upset Pol Pot)
+Both approaches had problems, the Army approach tended to alienate the villagers, and the marine approach tended to accidentally arm and train the insurgents. While both had to ignore whatever corruption went-on in the provisional government of southern Vietnam.

Vietnam's goal was to develop and maintain its soveriegnty. Unification would be nice, too.
-Viet Cong wanted all foriegners out. Communist leanings, but mostly they just wanted the military occupation and corruption to end.
-NVA was much the same, but heavy propoganda that capitalism is inherently corrupt and communism is inherently good.
-ARVN wanted to give democracy a chance
-RTA wanted to maintain their monarchy for the glory of their emperor and USA #1 (because we gave them a bunch of tanks 'n stuff, nothing sez "I wub you long time" like a few boatloads of free tanks, they still use them)
-Cambodia was a corrupt genocidal opium-smoking dictatorship, but US-Cambodian relations were still a better love story than Twighlight.

Russia and China saw this chunk of SE Asia as "Korean-war, second act" with a very strong chance of winning valuable allies.
-Both saw everyone else as Imperial expansionists, leading to Sino-Soviet tensions to come to a head around 1968. In 1972 China tried annexing Vietnam kinda like what happened to Tibet... except Vietnamese people aren't pacifist-pushovers.
Banned for leafing so often.

>Missed you, too. Git with the posty.
In Spam 9 yrs ago Forum: Spam Forum
Get Clem.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet