Avatar of IceHeart

Status

Recent Statuses

6 yrs ago
Desktop profile login won't work. Coincidence that Windows 7 is no longer supported on same day? Consider me doubtful.
7 yrs ago
I wonder why I have no notifications, then I realize I forgot to sub to my own threads. Whoops!
5 likes
7 yrs ago
I'm having way too much fun with my Legend of Zelda Encylopedia. This is the game that got me into roleplaying so have a lot invested in it's lore and stories. Too bad can't have all the games too.
4 likes
8 yrs ago
It's begining to look a lot like Christmas...too bad it was already looking this way back in October...
2 likes
8 yrs ago
Whew, looks like only 5 days, stupid thing showed me six just to try and scare my pants off...

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Finally got around to it. @Hostile

Name: Diana Florence

Age: 26

Gender: Female

Occupation: Mercenary

Appearance:


Personality: Diana is a hard worker, diligent in her work but tries to make sure to take it easy from time to time. As a mercenary she tries not to get to attached to people and things since she rarely has the luxury of staying in any one location for long. Because of her lifestyle she can seem a bit detached from the world, rarely batting an eye at the less fortunate since it can be hard enough to take care of herself. She does her best to accomplish any job she is given to the letter and has a decent reputation.

History: Growing up on a fantasy like world made for quite a rough life for young Diana. She grew up in a small town, her father was a soldier for the local militia while her mother was a seamstress. As a solider her father was rarely home and she tried to help out her mother whenever she could with her work. It was a quaint, but hard life, but things changed for the worse.

When she was 10 years old her father was drafted into a larger army sent to fight against a reptilian menace that was threatening human settlements. This draft had the unfortunate consequence of lowering the guard of many of the smaller towns and villages, including her own. Raiders saw their opportunity and attacked, killing many and devastating quite a few areas.

She and her mother were forced to flee their home and leave everything behind. Angered by what had happened, Diana decided to follow after her father’s footsteps so she could also fight when needed. She tried to find people who would teach her in her spare time, which was not much, until she was old enough to join the local town guard.

It was not an easy life and she found herself often ridiculed and made fun of for being one of the few women in their ranks. Disgusted by how they acted, she soon left and temporarily joined a mercenary group to learn under them. Over the years she learned many skills and gained a few scars, but eventually she outgrew the group and decided to become a lone mercenary so she could choose which jobs to do without worry.

Weapons and Equipment:

  • Haversack: To carry everything she needs.
  • Short Sword: Her weapon of choice.
  • Short Axe: Both a weapon and a tool.
  • Concealed Knives: For any encounter.
  • Rope: Always useful and very versatile.
  • Lantern: Essential for surviving the night and dark places.
  • Light Armor: As a Mercenary on the move she has to travel light, wearing mostly hardened leather type armor, though she has splurged by getting a little extra protection at the top with some chainmail underneath. She relies on her reflexes and battle experience to defend herself in combat.
  • Buckler: A small shield for melee combat made of iron.
  • Sewing Kit: For those many traveling needs.


Skills and Abilities:

Solid Sewing Skills: As the daughter of a seamstress this is only to be expected and is very useful for on the road. With a little needle and thread she can easily stitch up anything in need of repair. This also comes in handy if she needs to sew herself up after a battle.

Tracker: As a mercenary this is an integral skill for many jobs. Diana can track both humanoids and animals, though other humans are often her target of choice. Unless the target is quite good at hiding their tracks she can chase and follow a target for days.

Accomplished Swordsman: While by no means is she a top level fighter, her skill with a sword and buckler are quite good, enough that most people need a good bit of training to match up to her.

Street Smarts: Having roughed it with mercenaries and by herself, she has picked up quite a bit of knowledge when in the cities. She knows the best ways to get information, follow a lead, and how to haggle for a good deal.

Thanks for the notification. I'll try to get things in gear soon but been quite busy recently.
Well this is certainly interesting. Central European Countries, led by Hungary, are creating their own coalition basically to stop illegal immigration. More and more its looking like the EU is starting to fracture in pieces, a good portion of that credit going to the mass immigration policies the EU tried to force on all its members.
<Snipped quote by IceHeart>
Are you suggesting that a Catholic adoption agency gave children to a homosexual couple rather than a religious one? Because that would kind of blow my mind.


I don't remember the minute details but I am fairly certain it was not a Catholic adoption agency for this case but certainly one that had state funds. Ha ha, if it was a Catholic adoption agency that would blow my mind as well. XD
<Snipped quote by IceHeart>

If you have an alternative framework you should call Nature and get it published. Overturning the fundamental theory of modern biology would make you a shoe in for that sweet sweet Nobel Prize money.


You know now I am curious as to how many people here believe in Pure Evolution = As in Nothing, or Something, somehow, someway became Us and everything else. Who believes in Intelligent Designed Evolution, as in some being, entity, whatever, helped engineer the current Universe as we know it. And who believes in Intelligent Design full on, as in no super long process of evolution from proteins to current life and instead life was just created. Just to note most people in this camp think there probably were 'base' species and breeding brought about all the varieties we have today.
<Snipped quote by IceHeart>
Religious activity is also up to a person. Couldn't not a homosexual just as easily declare religious observance to be wrong and demand that religious believers have less rights? Religious people may feel they have some sort of moral high ground on the matter but they don't get to morally legislate on the matter. Don't invite them to your private Jesus club if you like, but in the public sphere we should all enjoy the same rights and the same respect.

I'm personally in favor of the free practice of religion and the free practice of your sexual identity. Crazy notions.


Don't know what kind of Jesus club you're talking about as Jesus wants to save everyone no matter who they are or what they've done. That being said he really wants people to choose him and wants them to stop self-destructive ways, but God did give free choice to man and that is something he will never take away. But I digress and many of you will obviously disagree with this sentiment...

You go on about how they have less rights but the current example is adoption. Adoption is not a right, many people have to work very hard to be considered to have adoption privileges. I know a wonderful heterosexual couple who were denied being able to adopt children because of their religion, so why were the kids they could have taken in given to homosexual couples instead? Criteria must be met and maybe that homosexual couple meets all the right criteria except for their homosexual relationship, but if these adoption agencies can refuse to give a heterosexual couple a kid because of their religion why can't Catholic agencies do the same with homosexuals? Can't have this kind of double standard floating around.
<Snipped quote by IceHeart>

Been a while since anthropology class, but I'm pretty sure extended families are much more the norm throughout all of human history.


You are quite right about extended families being the norm, I was hasty with my earlier words but even if they are extended they are still based on heterosexual relationships. Multi-generational households were/are indeed the norm, kinda forgot for a moment nuclear excluded the grandparents and such XD.

I don't believe in the evolutionary model myself as I find concrete evidence severely lacking, I was just using the example for debate. If anything I think humanity has essentially been breaking down genetically over the generations though our technology has helped us cope with that.

By no means am I advocating for homosexuality to be illegal, but homosexuals also have to accept the fact that religious people have rights as well, it is a two way street. Also race is a completely different issue, race is genetic, while homosexuality may or may not be genetic homosexual activity is up to the person.
@NightinGem Historically the nuclear family is a tried and true construction that has served many civilizations throughout history and has been the backbone for many a society. Also what scientific evidence is there that a homosexual family is better for children? There is not enough evidence to prove that though there are certainly many, many studies that show single-parent homes to statistically be a lot worse off then two parent ones, so you really lost me on this supposed 'scientific evidence'.

As for the federal funding part, if they could keep running with federal funding part I do agree that would be for the best; however, it is still a very bad idea for the state to try and tell a religious run organization to do something that conflicts with their deeply held religious beliefs. The easiest way out is of course to just split from the government but depending on the situation that may not be an option if the adoption agency is to survive and continue to do good work.

Who would voluntarily do that? You underestimate the stupidity of humanity I am afraid...that said, that boy should never have been allowed to participate since his original biological gender gave him a clear advantage over the girls. It was like having a bunch of natural steriods pumped in that a natural born female would never have access to.

Looked at that study and it literally states, "In summary response to question 1 (‘‘How representative and culturally, ethnically, and economically diverse were the gay/lesbian households in the published literature behind the APA Brief?’’), we see that in addition to relying primarily on small, non-representative, convenience samples, many studies do not include any minority individuals or families. Further, comparison studies on children of gay fathers are almost non-existent in the 2005 Brief. By their own reports, social researchers examining same-sex parenting have repeatedly selected small, non-representative, homogeneous samples of privileged lesbian mothers to represent all same-sex parents. This pattern across three decades of research raises significant questions regarding lack of representativeness and diversity in the same-sex parenting studies."

Also hardly any of them had heterosexual nuclear family comparison groups so that is a problem as well.

So that doesn't really tell me much of anything due to how they were done.
@The Harbinger of Ferocity

Perhaps the world will never be just. Perhaps hoping for universal rights and tolerance for everyone is a foolish notion that can never be attained.

So What? What if we can make the world 50% more just, 10%. What if all I can hope to achieve in the world is to make life better for one person. I'll take it. Just for who? I'll look for people suffering from injustice and start at the top of the list.

So what if there places in the world where people have it far worse than they do in the United States? In Africa they have forced genital mutilation, why are we wasting time on this whole woman's suffrage thing! It doesn't absolve us of the responsibility to act locally. We CAN have progress on multiple fronts, we must in fact. I don't live in Rwanda, or Chechnya or Iraq, I have to try to make what difference I can, where I can.

I hope that the world can be made better, and I'll work at it. I'd kinda like to leave the place better than I found it.


Now I agree in that we should all work to make the world a better place when we can, but you must also ask the question of when your 'better' is actually making it worse for others. Respect goes both ways and forced tolerance quickly morphs into oppression at its finest. Is making people, like religious folks who have strong beliefs that homosexual acts are bad, or simply people who believe in the traditional nuclear family of a mother and father as the best model of society, accept non-traditional relationships or genders as normal really a good thing?

Trying to force a certain set of moral codes on someone is an absolute recipe for disaster. As society knows, certain rules need to be put in place or society will fall apart, but anytime you go into moral territory that has little to do the basic functions of society you will find most people will not let you just tell them what you think is right or wrong. Is it ever right to force someone to do something they believe they should never do, like celebrate a homosexual wedding when they believe it is between a man and a woman only? Is that person who decided not to celebrate something they don't believe in a bad person, even though they would never think of harming a homosexual in the first place? Most of you would probably say no.

Prejudice and discrimination, of course they take place and on a wide variety of subject matters. When such things are seen, people should point it out, but that is so very different from people literally shoving the subject matter into some person's face and demanding they accept whatever it is or face the consequences, it has gone way too far. Let's say we have an evolutionary scientist who claims homosexual behavior will eventually die out so there is no reason to encourage the behavior in society? The scientist has a right to their opinion and should not be forced to write a retraction of any of their writings on the subject.

@The Harbinger of Ferocity
outandequal.org/2017-workplace-equali… This is already in draft, but in 28 states, one can be fired for being gay or trans.

South Dakota passed a law allowing foster and adoption agencies that receive state funding to reject LGBT parents in grounds of religious objection.

hrc.org/blog/100-anti-lgbtq-bills-int… Here's a neatly compiled list with sources and explanation~


The workplace one was a bit out of my depth so I'll skirt that one, but the law about adoption agencies hits very close to home. This is the common hot button topic, for does the government have the right to tell a religiously run organization what to do because they give funds to it? This is a seriously big issue for Catholic adoption agencies in particular who have had to wrestle with this one. These adoption agencies want the best for the kids which is why they decided to try and find as many nuclear family homes as possible, which statistically is the best environment for children. Add on to the fact that most Catholics believe homosexual behavior to be a sin and now you have the state forcing these religious groups to give up these children, they have been caring for, to someone they believe is not a good fit for the child, talk about a heart breaker.

I tried looking at those bills and found most of them dealing with gender identity politics, some with the above issue, and others I really could not figure out since they gave little to no information. Gender identity stuff is way too easily abused, such as a boy becoming a woman to win the women's wrestling championship in Texas. I think a lot of parents have the right to be worried about people using gender identity to their own ends as examples of such have already been popping up.

That being said...can we just keep laws out of the bathroom? Never needed them before so let's just stop...



Blast it everyone is too fast at posting, keep writing and more stuff pops up XD.
Nonsense. If you sufficiently raised the standard of living we could all unite behind hedonistic excess! People go for religion because their lives suck and/or they were brainwashed as children. It can eventually be overcome.


Hedonistic excess only goes so far, no matter how much someone has or how good their life is, people will always start to question life, themselves, etc. There is a reason why so many rich and famous people get suckered into weird cults, or suddenly gain religion, because religion helps them fill a certain emptiness and void within themselves that they were unable to fill with all their possessions. No matter how good life gets religion will never disappear for a few reasons.

Things will never buy you happiness and many people are unable to effectively find what can fill their hearts but sometimes religion can help them with that. No matter how much one has often times they will find themselves dissatisfied with life and have a want for something beyond what they can see.

The questions of life will often make someone question their existence and go on a spiritual journey. Why am I here? Is there any point to my life? Is this life really all there is? How did life begin anyway? Many people when they seriously ask those questions will find those answers through some kind of spiritual reflection.

D.E.A.T.H. Death is always on the horizon and many people find religion when they come face to face with death, be it the fear of dying or just the want for something more. As far as we know the only way to beat Death is through a supernatural power which religion often provides, be it a way for eternal life after this one, or a method of breaking the cycle of death.

It is an impossibility for Religion to ever die out.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet