Avatar of Keyguyperson

Status

Recent Statuses

4 yrs ago
Current So, as an American, what do I do when I need to choose between illegal immigration to Canada and dying in a civil war?
5 yrs ago
Woo! Got the prick!
8 yrs ago
When you try to write an essay on climate change but it just degrades into angry rambling halfway through.
5 likes
8 yrs ago
Conquer it, conquer the bread.
2 likes
8 yrs ago
Up until today I've never had any trouble with my EUIV Japan games. Today I got stomped five times in a row before even uniting the country.
2 likes

Bio

I'm a weeaboo communist. Are you surprised?

EDIT: You probably are now, but I'm not going to tell you why you wouldn't have been like two years ago. You get to agonize over that yourself.

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>

No it isn't.


The Naval section? The ship that's literally just the Yamato?

Seriously, how did you miss that? It specifically says the it uses an antimatter reactor.
Keyguy, where did this new giant ship come from? It seems like it came out of nowhere


It's in my app. My. Fucking. App.
<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>

Be honest... Which are more common? The fair ones or the my-word-is-law ones? :P


Good point.
<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>

I wouldn't actually warn for that Key, you know I am not like that. I am just pointing out that doing it to any GM regardless of who it is could be considered a stupid idea.


Not if the GM is fair and can take criticism.
<Snipped quote>

The idea is solid, but this is one step away from Kardashev-style technical tiers that will only be given legitimate worth by a handful of player nations that effectively set an extremely inconsistent technological standard for "advanced". I'd argue antimatter reactors are innately inferior to thorium fission reactors or fusion reactors due to their need for active containment units that, should they fail, will result in the utter destruction of the reactor and anything within an X mile radius, but I doubt anyone cares about any of these factors because the superficial Space Opera standard can easily be invoked as a suitable (to me: sloppy) counterargument.


To be completely honest, this is 100% true. I have a naval ship that runs off of antimatter, and either nobody realized that, or nobody realized what an absolutely terrible idea it was. If that ship is EMPd, then you can say goodbye to its whole fleet. But this is sci-fi. You can say that all your ships use fusion reactors if you want, but don't expect everyone else to do the same because it's more realistic. The Stardust/Void of the Stars/Star Empires (Let's pretend that last name never existed, shall we?) have always been focused on letting the players do whatever they want without godmodding. Wilson, at one point, wanted to implement universal FTL restrctions, which was a major problem because everyone's FTL worked differently (Aside from all the minor nations that for some reason used the same type of drive). That argument almost killed the OOC. Let's not have another, shall we?
Why do you throw around comments like that? Considering I am the GM its a bad idea.


You know, this could easily be seen as abuse of-

Oh fuck it. If I say that then it'll turn out to be a "joke".
A few years ago a ship from the UFTS came into their territory and opened up new trade routes. When they came under attack by a member of the Stellar Dominion, though, two factions decided to form a mutual defense agreement with the other FPA societies for the duration of the alien aggression against them. These two factions were the Interstellar Trade Consortium (ITC) and Sunrise Security Services (SSS).


I saw this and thought "Ermahgerd dish iz sho gud"

WE SHOULD WRITE A HISTORY OF THE TWO FACTIONS

IT WOULD BE TOTALLY USELESS BUT SO COOL
391
Why don't you answer anything in a sensible manner?
First wiki page.

Yay.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet