<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>
No it isn't.
The Naval section? The ship that's literally just the Yamato?
Seriously, how did you miss that? It specifically says the it uses an antimatter reactor.
<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>
No it isn't.
Keyguy, where did this new giant ship come from? It seems like it came out of nowhere
<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>
Be honest... Which are more common? The fair ones or the my-word-is-law ones? :P
<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>
I wouldn't actually warn for that Key, you know I am not like that. I am just pointing out that doing it to any GM regardless of who it is could be considered a stupid idea.
<Snipped quote>
The idea is solid, but this is one step away from Kardashev-style technical tiers that will only be given legitimate worth by a handful of player nations that effectively set an extremely inconsistent technological standard for "advanced". I'd argue antimatter reactors are innately inferior to thorium fission reactors or fusion reactors due to their need for active containment units that, should they fail, will result in the utter destruction of the reactor and anything within an X mile radius, but I doubt anyone cares about any of these factors because the superficial Space Opera standard can easily be invoked as a suitable (to me: sloppy) counterargument.
Why do you throw around comments like that? Considering I am the GM its a bad idea.
A few years ago a ship from the UFTS came into their territory and opened up new trade routes. When they came under attack by a member of the Stellar Dominion, though, two factions decided to form a mutual defense agreement with the other FPA societies for the duration of the alien aggression against them. These two factions were the Interstellar Trade Consortium (ITC) and Sunrise Security Services (SSS).