Avatar of Keyguyperson

Status

Recent Statuses

4 yrs ago
Current So, as an American, what do I do when I need to choose between illegal immigration to Canada and dying in a civil war?
5 yrs ago
Woo! Got the prick!
8 yrs ago
When you try to write an essay on climate change but it just degrades into angry rambling halfway through.
5 likes
8 yrs ago
Conquer it, conquer the bread.
2 likes
8 yrs ago
Up until today I've never had any trouble with my EUIV Japan games. Today I got stomped five times in a row before even uniting the country.
2 likes

Bio

I'm a weeaboo communist. Are you surprised?

EDIT: You probably are now, but I'm not going to tell you why you wouldn't have been like two years ago. You get to agonize over that yourself.

Most Recent Posts

Here's my final app. I made a major change to the military section. I don't think it's too strong, but you might have another opinion.

Fun fact: In the entire USN Pacific Fleet, there is one frigate. Just one. It is named Gary.

I found that out while researching the fleet to figure out how many ships I would have.
<Snipped quote by ASTA>Railguns aren't THAT much more effective, actually.
Multi-stage cannons and/or liquid propellant can easily make up for the difference.
Heck, even going for 150mm range guns would be cutting close to that level.
Actually, conventional cannons have a lot of advantages over railguns so long we don't get to unrealistic stupid high levels of power.
Mounting railguns would basically limit a tank to be a one-trick pony which uses the same method to engage all kinds of targets.
Meanwhile conventional cannons can use various sensitive/intelligent munitions, gun-launched missiles and actual complex ammunition.
Albeit this versatility comes at the cost of ammo.
Once the rail erosion issue is solved the Railgun is actually a much more economical weapon on the long run. We are 35 years in the future so I suppose the very least people solved this much.

Speaking of which, technically the setting would also support railgun rifles, too.
Railgun components scale down relatively well and your only concern is the power source.
I think compact enough batteries with solar panels and other alternatives for charging are doable.
Personal laers are possible, too. But well, they would be pretty poor in this aspect.
I made calculations assuming a 100kW pulse laser weapon with the spot diameter of 5cm against human targets. It works rather well against unarmored enemies but once I put it against any sorts of body armor material you won't even burn that through a millimeter. So your only chance is hoping the armor wasn't treated to block radiation and the bleedthrough is sufficient to harm whoever is inside that suit.
That's a 100kW system (my anti-missile defense if you wonder, wanted to test how it'd fare in anti-infantry role)
You'd be happy to have a 1-5kW handheld laser rifle with your infantry.

EDIT: But yeah, M1 Abrams or Leopard 2 would be pretty much the T-54/55 of the setting if not worse.
At first I wanted to say T-72 but those tanks at least have the potential to put up a fight.


Like you said, power supply is the problem. An infantry railgun would need to have a massive backpack to be of any use, and if you want it to be a super-death murder kill I-shoot-and-one-slug-goes-through-twelve-people, then you'd probably need a robot to carry the power with you (aside from the robot carrying the generator so that you are capable of reloading). And of course, if you go for the latter, you've basically got something closer to a turret that has to be set up. The main problem with railguns is that they have extremely limited "ammunition", and have to constantly be resupplied with new batteries. If you build a force around railguns that doesn't have a couple nuclear generators driving along with it, you lose your supply lines and all your weapons are worthless. So far, the smallest thing we can mount railguns on is the Zumwalt.

Obviously, at this point, it's possible to mount them on tanks. The real question is whether or not that's even a slightly good idea. Artillery? Sure, longer range. Tanks? Well, the shell is probably going to go straight through the tank. Which actually isn't all that useful. Long range, explosive payloads are the best way to go with railguns. Unless you're on a ship. In which case throw railguns everywhere and rain a hailstorm of shells upon your enemy at six times the speed of found from a hundred kilometers away.
<Snipped quote by raja1020>

Absolutely. They lost the war and opted for peace^^

But if we're going down the path of realism, how realistic is a union of India and Pakistan after they nuked eachother :D


There's a nation that calls itself the Soviet Empire. The only realism we have to be concerned with is how advanced we are.
Finished my App, am putting it here for your review. Please tell me if I did anything wrong or if anything needs to be changed.


OH. MY. GOD.

This brings back memories! In the first forum roleplay, I played as a nation that controlled Antarctica! Hell, underground cities, founded by scientists, made up of refugees... it's literally the same!

That roleplay lasted... what was it? Two years? Long enough for us to go from one-liners to advanced-level posts.

THIS IS A SIGN.

EDIT: AND PALE SKIN IN THE UNDERGROUND CITIES? WERE YOU IN THAT ROLEPLAY? ARE YOU ACTUALLY ME? AM I JUST A CLONE?
<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>

I am shocked and mortified

I've been kicking around a theme idea for a while... but in order to work at all, it would have to be sort of a surprise. The presentation is part of the theme. So..... vote on this for surprise theme!


I used my little givefeedbackythingymajigger to vote for this. But that first line was hilarious. So consider this a laugh. That doesn't count towards voting.
I'll just put down what you all thought I was going to say:

History.
I love how everyone just planning religious wars while I draw historical connections.
<Snipped quote by Mihndar>

With over 51 million muslims in your country, it might be wise to avoid the torn of Allah. That are 51 million potential terrorists waging Jihad on the oppressive infidels of the Sovjet Empire :D


I'm never going to get over that name. EVER.
Yeah, I'm not going to be able to enter this one. I think I ran out of creative things that I'm capable of.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet