Avatar of The World

Status

Recent Statuses

4 mos ago
Current Need info, so might as well throw a bottled question into the ocean of statuses... What are some features/ideas/etc. that YOU want to see in a monster taming/raising game? All genuine ideas welcome.
1 like
5 mos ago
@Dane, I need you to talk to a physicist and a psychiatrist, in that order, twice.
2 likes
5 mos ago
"The worst thing you can do to a character is to make them aware that they're fictional." Ironically, the character who would say this is from an RP I'm not in anymore... Funny, that.
3 likes
5 mos ago
Just like in JJK, explaining the joke makes it funnier. Luckily that's built into this one.
3 likes
5 mos ago
Jimbo that's not right. Humans are a social creature, there's not a single one who can truly survive on their own. Even those who seem to be able can only do so because they learned from others.
8 likes

Bio



"Unfortunately, gods aren't the type that should be believed in."
"No doubt this drought will one day end, but it will be by tears."





Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by The World>

Those abilities are really interesting. And they actually take Quantum Physics past "it's both because we don't know" to "you know what sod this we're making it both". That amuses me to no end. The history is sad but exceptional.


Lol thanks. And yeah, I tried to make the history as realistic as I could predict if it actually happened.
<Snipped quote by DarkwolfX37>

Because in this setting, it's basically counterproductive.


I disagree, but the stats are the stats.
gOOD FUCKING CHOICE SOUL WOW
<Snipped quote by The World>

All good points. I'm still going to operate under the assumption that we're being threatened until we either find out otherwise or we end up being unable to stop it and you turn out to be correct.


Coatlicue: We are being threatened. I'm not saying we aren't. But we're being threatened by Baphumet. I'm saying that we need to not jump to the aid of the one threatening us and risk becoming what we're here in the first place to prevent just because of a wild assumption a certain someone made. Even if it turns out to be true, I value the one who did something incredible but never did anything to us over the one who's killed some of us and hasn't told us anything they're thinking. Besides... *Mutters, almost whispering* Ares trusted him...
I swear I typo yander's name every time I type it with a capital y.
<Snipped quote by The World>

Well, I still take partial blame for being so easily irritated.

What is MM? My memory with a lotnof the Trigger stuff is jeobkenxisbj.


Mammon machine. Yamder's name for the original generate class.

<Snipped quote by The World>

How about not banned, but regulated?


I personally feel we are regulating it, but idk.
<Snipped quote by The World>

Yep, it went through.

Anyways. It's not directed towards just you. Heck, its mainly put in place so you, I, and anyone else who may join are protected under it.

Although, it does give beneficial help to the others as well. A bit of a double-edged sword. However, it is fair and just, and I believe it covers all bases.


Again, I know it wasn't intended to be against me, but let's just pull up some stats quick.

Religious discussion: likelihood of involvement
David - 60/100
Whizz - 60/100
Sven - 30/100
Spirit - 10/100
Soul - 5/100
Dark - 70/100
Tox - 1/100

Heated discussion: likelihood of involvement
David - 70/100
Whizz - 40/100
Sven - 10/100
Spirit - 10/100
Soul - 5/100
Dark - 90/100
Tox - 5/100

Members who are almost identical in views: 3
Members with opposing views: 1
Members who are in between: 3
Members in between most likely to side with the three: 2

Likelihood of instigating religious discussion on any level:
David - 70/100
Whizz - 80/100
Sven - 40/100
Spirit - 5/100
Soul - 20/100
Dark - 75/100
Tox - 5/100

See what I mean about the stacked deck? We've already got a case study for what you're proposing, and it led to me being gone for a year. David, the "next in charge but actually the one in charge by any measurement despite us saying nobody is in charge" decided no more religious talk, didn't follow it, and the 4/5 decided it's fine for that but not for opposing talk (see members viewpoints) and "action was taken," in that I left because I clearly wasn't wanted. I'd rather avoid similar setups, even though it's our natural state.
Btw whizz you can look at that spoiler now. If you can figure out what it meant you can basically solve the whole thing ic atm.
<Snipped quote by The World>

The fact that there were sixteen worked. I know how it was meant to be, but I strongly feel as though it's better the way it was. I understand that you disagree though.


Coatlicue: I get that it worked, but Yander put it back into the MM, remember? I know we're talking about the one who did something impossible, but do you expect him to have found a way to keep the powers of it with it totally removed from him? Or are we waiting for him to come out of the MM like a newborn? Because if so, that brings up so many new potential issues that the likelihood of us having any impact becomes near zero.
<Snipped quote by The World>

Well, sorry then. I took it as repeating what I said in a mocking way. My bad.


nah. The way you interpreted it fits with my personality, so it's in no way your fault. I should've cleared it up as I did it.

© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet