You're not adding more by posting lol.
What exactly have you been adding by your nudges that people haven't been contributing to the discussion when this thread, if anything, has been one of the best examples to date of people staying on topic?
Your failing to reply to my post is not a failing of mine.
You feel attacked because I pointed out how you have been repeating the same comments and haven't really evolved your discussion? Since you were getting so offended and upset, I said maybe you should ignore this conversation since it offends you so much.
- Quote the statement that indicates that I am attacked. No, really. If anything, I'm ignored. Please, indicate where I have actually been attacked. >.>
- You have not answered legitimate questions, such as "who else actually cares about this?" which I would think is pivotal to a discussion about something that, even if you would call it a small and simple change, would change the structure of the sight. In terms of active users giving their replies, you're badly outmatched here, and again, the iota is on you to prove that there is actually support for anything you are saying. Ignoring me only tears the carpet out from under your argument.
- Every post I have made in this thread has been logical, analytical and, I believe, distant from ad hominem. Until this very sentence, it is a stark contrast to what you have done across the entirety of this thread and the last couple pages in particular (and really, I'd consider you trying to make an echo chamber of yes a fact, but sure, lets call it ad hominem to give you a point here).
----> To get to the point of above, I'll tie it to my first point - how is presenting a counter argument and asking you to back yourself up when suggesting a change for the forum 'being offended'? Am I being offended by presenting a counter argument to your points? If that's the case, your chance for logical discussion on the guild is likely to be exactly zero.
I rather like debates of this nature. I can go on all day, and I'd be happy to do it, because I like to debate when I have a full handle on the topic. Especially since this thread is turning into a heavy anchor that drags your request down to oblivion, as you have no supporters in this thread. Absolutely none. Plenty of opponents, though, and plenty of reasons why what you ask is not necessary. The logical destruction of the thread's premise will remain even as the thread itself is devolving.
<Snipped quote by ArenaSnow>
This right here ^ is about you feeling like you're contributing to the conversation when you're trying to destroy it because you don't agree with this discussion even existing. Therefore, I offered that you not bother with it since you're clearly now just talking about how you are "replying" and not how you are replying to the topic "World-Building."
>looks at the title of the thread>reads own posts that have all addressed the topic stated in the title>looks where I'm putting all these postsOkie
The supporters have refused to enter this thread because of the hostility you and the other players who normally troll the discussion forums have shown. They do not want to get involved. So when I was saying they would because it seemed like they would post, they chose not to because of the negative atmosphere. I am trying to get rid of that negative atmosphere to turn this back into a pleasant discussion whether people agree or disagree. Even with the former writers disagreeing, they were able to do so civilly. The people who have left so far were not civil and I'm glad they left. If you're the next one, then that just puts more positivity back on this discussion.
- Trolling = countering your points, agreement = logical debate. Is that true? It's a yes or no question.
- [Citation Needed]
- Negative Atmosphere
TM is not a valid excuse. We will have to agree to disagree, I guess.
- People who have left so far posted their own arguments and points, and left when you attacked them after not finding a way to prove your own points valid. They knew they were punching a brick wall, and they reasonably left because of it. I have an iron fist. I'll punch the proverbial wall all day, because for whatever reason, I have time to waste doing so until you give me a proper response. And guess what? When someone comes in with support, I will challenge them to back themselves up too, and address the points made so far. And if they're reasonable, perhaps I'll even agree. If that is trolling, then yes, I am going to troll this thread right until it gets locked.
But I'm not going to continue to "entertain" you if you are offended. If I choose not to respond to you, then I'm sorry. It's something you'll just have to deal with.
I don't care. I'll still reply, and I'll still wait for you to make this a logical debate. Yes, I'm immortal.
@Ruby can we close this as the OP has become increasingly hostile and the thread is just running circles at the moment and is/has already breached the point of hostility
Probably for the best.