Avatar of Bee
  • Last Seen: 1 mo ago
  • Old Guild Username: supersoccerball
  • Joined: 13 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1565 (0.34 / day)
  • VMs: 20
  • Username history
    1. Bee 9 yrs ago
    2. █████████████ 13 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

2 yrs ago
Current i missed me some good ol fashioned status bar hijinks
1 like
2 yrs ago
WOP WOP WOP WOP WOP
1 like
4 yrs ago
free ralts
2 likes
4 yrs ago
oh understandable good luck bud
4 yrs ago
what
1 like

Bio

BAYLEY APPRECIATION STATION









Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by Bee>

I mean true, but the fact that they specifically made DLC to then lock most of the player base out of it just rubs me the wrong way. Plus surely they'd have enough independence that they'd attempt to support GTA 5's singleplayer post-Online. People can go ahead and blame Take Two, I know I am, but Rockstar themselves are sitting pretty on a fat wad of cash from ignoring the thing that got them to this position. Why change?


surprisingly enough, they actually don't have that much independence. this is evidenced by the sheer amount of GTAO stuff they've been pushing out and leaving the single player alone, not to mention the rampant microtransactions. that's more than likely stuff take two is telling them how to do. it is a trend with all of the games that they've put out lately, from GTA V to my beloved video game sports. all of them suffer from greedy cash grabbing techniques.

they also don't get all of the mad dosh that GTA V has raked in. if anything, take two has more of the money than rockstar does. as much as they would like to go independent or all that, it just isn't feasible for them.
<Snipped quote by Bee>

doesn't really seem like Rockstar are doing much to stop them tho


because take two owns rockstar

can't really stop your higher ups can you
very very phenomenal
take two will find a way
I'll go after Sifter


i am in an 80s groove rn
i'm in
@CaptainSully That's fucking dope!
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet