Avatar of Galavani

Status

Recent Statuses

9 yrs ago
Masturbation addiction can be hard to overcome, but with the help of your friends you can all beat it together.
21 likes
9 yrs ago
High School Parties made me feel like a batteries, because I was always not included :(
7 likes
9 yrs ago
Wealthy women like hot baths because it reminds them of hell, where they come from.
5 likes

Most Recent Posts

Will have something up soon
@Dynamo Frokanehow is he a mark 2?


All player character's Mechs are Mk2+, I mentioned this in the tier description and it was discussed in the interest check.


If you want to make test/fun characters could I ask you keep them in the interest check? Just as a general rule for everyone I'd like to keep the OOC as unclogged as possible.

Heres the link

http://www.roleplayerguild.com/topics/153107-outcast-mecha-rp-need-assistance/ooc?page=2#post-3966476
And I think Im finished with mine. Was going to put it out as a WIP here, but Google Documents covered for me. How does it look?



Everything looks fine, but only 2 gadgets please, and there is only room for one thing in your sub weapon slot, so youll have to pick.

Also as said above the Solo scale is on the lower end, so if you want your mecha to be more solo orientated you need to have a lower number, like a 2 or a 3.

Everything else seems fine.
@Dynamo Frokane

I think I'm good


A few things, Backstory is still too thin, 'classified' isnt going to be acceptable I understand not revealing everything. but we need to know more about your character, two meaty paragraphs please. So far you have a timeline like description just telling me about his military career.

Too many listed in the Gadgets slot, really should only be 2, apologies if I didnt make that clear.

In your gadget slot you have an 'elementus reactor' which is unlikely seeing as your Mech is a Mk2, youll have to pick 2 of the gadgets and stick with them I'm afraid.

Also if your solo/skirmisher rating is 8 he would be more of a skirmisher, I put Solo first for a reason

Solo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Skirmisher

So you might want to change it to 2

apart from that everything seems fine.
interested!
Yay more opinions....

And thats just what they are OPINIONS, please only post here with the understanding that these choices are subjective to the individual and no one is stating objective facts.

Absolutes can be hard, so to make it easy just post ONE of your favourite fandoms and one of your least favourite fandoms, you can insult people in the abstract (we do it all the time) but lets not use anyone's names.

A Fandom I Like!

The Phoenix Wright/Ace Attorney Fandom

I wanted to mention this one just because of how surprisingly refreshing it is. I mean considering its a visual novel game with cute colourful characters youd think itd be a weeb trash magnet. But Ive found the community and fans of this game to be very intelligent, calm and supportive. Even the 'online arguments' about this game tend to be about which characters are better fleshed out and that always seems to result in a calm and rational discussion (Feenie>>Edgy, Ema>>Maya STFU).

I think its because the gameplay revolves around really understanding dialouge and motivations and using reason and logic, that in a way this game 'weeds out' the idiot fans youd expect with this genre.

If there are any fanclubs I could join I have no Objection whatsoever.

Fandom I Dislike

Sonic The Hedgehog



Okay so there was a lot to choose from, but I had to settle on Sonic, not even because of the Cringey fanfiction or even the cringe fan art, damn near all video game fanfiction is cringe to me anyway. No, my issue is with the GAMES.

I'll put this out there right now, there are no good sonic games.

There are 'Okay' Sonic games, like the first 2 and maybe generations, and then the rest range from clunky, to shit, to unplayable. The Fandom is in my bad books simply for how they try to defend these wack games or convince me they are 'better than mario'. Fite me, bring your arguments, I need a good laugh.

@Gisk Yep you got the scale right on the stats, looking forward to the finished product.
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>

Abraham Lincoln was a creationist despite the fact that the Theory of Evolution was a thing two years before he became President. The facts and evidence were out there and he still believed in the Bible's story. Would you say he was an inept President because of his disbelief of modern (at the time) science? Or would you say that, in spite of this, he was able to lead the US effectively and bring it through the darkest hour of its history?

Lincoln isn't the only President to have believed in creation after the Theory of Evolution was realized. Grover Cleveland, Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, to name a few. I think that it had very little impact on how "good" of a President it made people. The denial of creationism among our Presidents didn't become common practice until over a hundred years after the Theory of Evolution.

It isn't far-fetched to presume that one's beliefs on the topic of evolution have little or even no effect on their ability to lead. Some of the best leaders throughout world history were absolutely terrible in their understanding of the sciences of their times. There are far more important and relevant qualities to determine a good leader.


Right I'm back, time to adress this.

Historical Context
, 2 years after the theory of evolution it was a new stange and yes blasphemous thing, the shit people got back then for not following a very narrow belief in christianity was social suicide, and sometimes criminal. There is no way Abraham Lincoln could have run as president let alone been a politician. And at the time, this theory was not widely accepted and overall the population were less scientfiically informed and skepticism ESPECIALLY into religous doctrine was not encouraged in public or private schools.

In short Lincoln was a good president FOR HIS TIME but to compare the merits of a man born nearly 210 years ago, and who lead the country during a civil war in times of the most social unrest the country has ever seen to Ben Carson running for president in 2016 is asanine at best.

Whatever way you split it, in MODERN TIMES a leader of the modern world needs to be logical, rational and at least somewhat skeptical. Denying overwhelming scientic evidence in favour of a fringe interpretation of the old testament is not an example of those qualities.

I dont care if hes a fucking brain surgeon, its irrelevant to being a political leader. Its only ONE academic field, you can be a master economist but suck at english literature, try to look at the bigger picture.
@Dynamo Frokane How are mechs transported and whatnot? Would they be stored somewhere or should I expect them to be running rampant like cars and bicycles?


Professionaly they are transported with airships, but regular folk in the freelands cant usually afford that so they are running/flying around and what not. But Mechs are very expensive and only a small percentage of the Fortune State own them.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet