North Korea has been threatening the United States every year since I can remember. Only this time we have a president who's ego cannot handle it and back down.





<Snipped quote by POOHEAD189>
Well I refer to my original point that outside of johns and sexpats, most people incorporate intelligence into their expectations for a partner. Intelligence is extremely broad, way past the academic. Charisma, Wit and Talent are all forms of intelligence, and you would be very hard pressed to find someone who isn't attracted to those things (along with their other requirements).
<Snipped quote by POOHEAD189>
I mean this is very hard to unpack, because we are speculating but 'plain-looking' is one of those terms that seems to change based on who you ask. Plain can mean ordinary and blank slate like, nothing particularly striking about them but perfectly fine looking, in other words, somewhere on the average scale, which is what I think you are trying to say.
But I would argue that id a sapiosexual didn't find someone attractive 'enough' or significantly less than average they would disregard the supposed intelligence because they wouldn't be giving them a chance to demonstrate that in the first place.
My main argument is that it seems to be fairly pointless term, damn near everyone finds some sort of intelligence attractive in one way or another, and damn near nobody would only take intelligence into account while completely disregarding physicality/attitude/status etc.
If the only observable difference is that they allegedly prioritise intelligence more than non-sapios we would need a way to determine how much non-sapios value intelligence on average and where the line gets drawn.
And not to get too gross, but dont sapios have normal libidos? Like do they need a vibrator to recite Shakespeare before they use one?
If you meet my initial physical and social requirements, I'd then be interested in learning more about what you know and if its to my liking then you might get somewhere."
Victor Davis Hansen's book on Greek Warfare is excellent, its a shame the rest of his work is such hackery :(
I like to think this is a result of faux intellect, sort of gathering all the trappings without integrating them or introspecting upon them. The more or learn about any given field the more conscious I am of the vistas I haven't yet glimpsed.
@POOHEAD189 Intelligence is sort of a tricky thing to define. I don't necessarily need a partner to be able to discuss Thucydides' interpretation of events in the Peloponnesian war (though I will admit that is hot!), but I do find erudition extremely attractive. It isn't the be all and end all of course. People can be intelligent and still be cruel malicious assholes. I have gathered an alarming number of data points to support this conclusion.
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
I suppose this would depend on context but basically attraction to intellect. A degree of intellect is certainly mandatory when I look for a partner so I suppose I can claim to at least a latent sapiosexuallity. It doesn't matter how physically attractive or how kind a guy is, if he seems like an idiot I'm not interested.