I might be doing a poor job of presenting the question. It might also be a stupid question. In any case I take your meaning.
Nah, it wasn't. No worries. It brought on a discussion^^





I might be doing a poor job of presenting the question. It might also be a stupid question. In any case I take your meaning.
@mdk
Firing a teacher because they are Muslim? No.
Firing a teacher because they were a member of ISIS? Yes.
Firing a professor because they a conservative? No.
Firing a professor because they are a Nazi? yes.
It really shouldn't be hard to make those distinctions in the majority of cases.
Im really not sure how this would play out with an actual federal employee. What would be the legal standing of a State Department employee if they showed up at a pro Nazi rally?
<Snipped quote by POOHEAD189>
I mean I agree wholeheartedly. But at the same time, if I'm forcing you to associate with people who don't represent your beliefs, is that not an infringement on your first amendment rights?
Perhaps a good chance to segue -- is it wrong to fire somebody for political views you don't agree with? Would that be different than -- for instance -- firing a teacher because they were Muslim? In my mind, if you're taking federal money, that's sort of a non-discrimination contract... you don't get to fire Drexel Bro, you don't get to fire the economics teacher who wears a Hijab, you don't get to fire the lesbian groundskeeper, etc., unless they're failing at their actual job. Where's everybody's line? Sort of a freedom-versus-freedom situation.
This is true, but it does make him an individual with which an institute of higher learning might rightly question its ties too.
