So, I see I missed absolutely nothing in the past ten pages of OOC. Good.
Retired Member
"Hayao Miyazaki"
-
Last Seen:
0-24 hrs ago
- Joined: 9 yrs ago
- Posts: 1629 (0.52 / day)
- VMs: 1
-
Username history
- Retired 9 yrs ago
-
Latest 10 profile visitors:
-
Most recent →
Captain Uni,
Eddie Brock,
Cyberlad,
Neziul,
Supermaxx,
Scrawl Banditta,
Sistros,
AndyC,
King Kindred,
flat lovenote
Status
User has no status, yet
Bio
User has no bio, yet
Most Recent Posts
And, yes. Garfield was a good Peter, and Spidey.
Holland's also a good Peter, he nails the younger years personality and I hope they continue to nail it as they have Peter mature and enter college years. His Spidey isn't as good, for me at least, but that primarily comes down to the Iron Man-lite storyline. I'm all for the Iron Spider suit, but not only was it too soon, it was distracting from Peter's overall character.
Holland's also a good Peter, he nails the younger years personality and I hope they continue to nail it as they have Peter mature and enter college years. His Spidey isn't as good, for me at least, but that primarily comes down to the Iron Man-lite storyline. I'm all for the Iron Spider suit, but not only was it too soon, it was distracting from Peter's overall character.
<Snipped quote by Retired>
I thought SM3 was good.
I don't have notes with good things to say about your writing, but we can still claim that a mysterious masked gentleman has stolen them and is flushing them down a toilet.
Shame.
After reading 60 years worth of comics, I'm tired of seeing people so dumb they can't figure out the obvious identities right in front of them. Or, when they do figure it out, die or immediately suffer from amnesia.
Also, Tobey's Peter Parker wasn't as great as people like to make it out to be. Just saying.
But, yes. Like I said, ASM 2 is right with SM3 in near-trash material. Enjoyable to watch to a degree, maybe, but not any good, and the films that ruined their respective series.
Also, Tobey's Peter Parker wasn't as great as people like to make it out to be. Just saying.
But, yes. Like I said, ASM 2 is right with SM3 in near-trash material. Enjoyable to watch to a degree, maybe, but not any good, and the films that ruined their respective series.
I'm about to cause more controversy. The Amazing Spider-Man is my favorite Spider-Film. I'm weird.
I'm actually right there with you.
ASM 2, definitely not. They fucked that up as badly as they did Spider-Man 3. But the first ASM was spot-on.
So, this one time, Mike, you're not weird. Just this once.
If it was a half-decent actress, I'd feel better.
If they hadn't done it in a hackneyed way, I'd feel better.
If they hadn't tried to lie about it and then backpedal, I'd feel better.
I wouldn't feel good about it, but I'd feel better.
If they hadn't done it in a hackneyed way, I'd feel better.
If they hadn't tried to lie about it and then backpedal, I'd feel better.
I wouldn't feel good about it, but I'd feel better.
Also, a note to all aspiring filmmakers: You're not being clever when you introduce an "original character" with a vanilla ass name like John Blake or Dave TotallyNotKhan (or whatever the fuck his name was). We see through it literally 100% of the time. Gaslighting your audience when they figured out your flimsy twist isn't impressive.
Looking at you, Michelle Jones.
Just as a note, I have a guest today and for the foreseeable future. So I'll still try to maintain a steady posting schedule, but just in case I slack a bit, that's why.
Byrd was on the thread, I wasn't worried about it being lost to the masses.
Wouldn't tagging them so they can't miss that be best? Considering how many pages this OOC is likely to go through by tonight...
© 2007-2026