Avatar of Armed Forces

Status

Recent Statuses

11 yrs ago
Current "One of the great secrets of life. Most people die of a sort of creeping common sense and discover too late that the only things one never regrets are one's mistakes. " -Lord Henry Wotton

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

If you read the lore, you would know that his first name is Captain, his last name is Crunch, and he's actually the Commander-in-Chief.


I'm higher than both commanders and chiefs.
<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

Captain Crunch outranks everyone.

<Snipped quote by souleaterfan320>

Best point.


His name is actually Captain and his rank is Crunch.
<Snipped quote by Nimda>

Fair point.

<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

But why does it bother you? Its just a cereal.


Well, for starters, I'm used to being in in secrets. Secondly, I'm not actually being serious at all.
<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

The world may never know.


But Captain Crunch does, and that bothers me, since I outrank him.

<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

Spoiler Alert: It's the crunch.


Always thought that was too predictable.
<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

But can you see why kids love the taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch?


I was never sure if it was the cinnamon or the toast.
<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

Right. The "muskets" argument is stupid. I'm not disagreeing with that.


I know you aren't. Just felt like ranting, and an opportunity presented itself. Apologies. 8P
<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

Not as good as I am at sarcasm.


I can live with that.
<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

I can tell.


Also a good liar.
<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

It was, however, designed in order for well trained militias to be formed, not for the average person (see also: utter moron) to have an assault rifle for no reason other than "Oh it's cool."
That's not to say we should ban them, but for fuck's sake we need to jump through tons of hoops in order to get a CAR, something we use to move places, and yet I could easily go get a high powered firearm that could mow down a ton of people. And >I< should not be able to legally get a gun. Yet I could, pretty easily.


And I respectfully disagree with the fact that cars have as many hoops to jump through as they do, but you probably expect that of me. Just, it bugs me that people make the argument I mentioned as though the Founding Fathers had:

•No expectation for the progression of technology in warfare.
•No inclination to design their Constitution for the future (which everyone knows they did.)
•Lack of foresight.
•Failed in creating a document with flexibility that would allow the country to run on its word for generations. (It has)
•Failed to see that designing the amendment with only their time's technology in mind would create a set of laws that couldn't change with the times or even fulfill the purpose for which it was made at any point beyond the immediate situation they needed it for, which was to fight oppressors on a level playing field in regards to equipment.

It doesn't make sense to argue that the Second Amendment was designed with muskets in mind and muskets only. Just argue the real reason you believe what you do, and say that you simply feel like the best way to make our country better is to restrict access to weapons. I have more respect for anyone who, if they don't know why they believe something, at least state that it's simply how they feel instead of trying to invent "reasons" like that.

EDIT: And I should say that making the argument about muskets and such does imply at least most of the bullets I wrote.
<Snipped quote by Armed Forces>

Love that one.


Thought it was hilarious, myself.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet