• Last Seen: 8 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: mbl
  • Joined: 13 yrs ago
  • Posts: 3648 (0.80 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. mdk 13 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

11 yrs ago
new leg today. I AM TERMINATOR REBORN
3 likes

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by mdk>

that doesn't mean anything tho. just coz I haven't read it all before I replied. lmao

in fact all it means is you say nothing of substance so it takes less time.

but that's just you being a contrarian ignoring that you literally typed less than him, which would take less time to read.

now we're going to do the "I must be good at b8ing because you're responding" go-round. It's not like this is a place you only come to respond to people or anything. lol


Bruh. This is Spam.
<Snipped quote by mdk>

you're yahoo news comments tier at best.


The difference is you're reading me. So I must be doing something right.

<Snipped quote by Nytem4re>

Haven't read all this, but that sounds like someone actually considering it, even if they disagree. nice.


<Snipped quote by mdk>

no you're not supposed to take it seriously, because you don't discuss anything seriously or actually want to change your viewpoint. you post b8 then mock actual productive responses.


No no no. I post clever, incisive counterpoints, then relentlessly mash F5 as I wait for chuckles and attention.
<Snipped quote by mdk>

But the British don't have Mexicans. They have the Polish.


That's the second-saddest goddamn thing I ever heard.
As someone of the British persuasion, I can confirm that I have never once had to say [taco]


That's the saddest goddamn thing I ever heard.
<Snipped quote by mdk>

and as per usual, no productive reply, just logical extremes, buzzwords, and memes


I'm supposed to..... what, take this seriously? Venezuela would like a word.
Basically, Communism to me means abolishing anyone who is not necessary for the production of whatever the company produces, or abolishing businesses or organizations that are not necessary to the industry they are involved in.


Farewell to the disabled, I suppose.

For example, a factory that produces cars, would not have an "owner" who simply makes a cut of the profits by holding the deed to the building or the land it sits on. Only people absolutely necessary to the operation of the factory would make money from the factory, and all would make the same money, but all would also have the same say in how the factory conducts business, how and what it produces, and so on. The person who puts tires on the cars would have as much say as the person who maintains the machines, as the person who cleans the toilets, and so on. This method, applied to all industries providing goods or services, would eliminate any semblance of Bourgeois elements in society, with all methods of production being owned collectively by the workers who operate them.


It will be the best car with the best tires and the best muffler and the best seatbelts and the best airbags and the best radio knob and the best company break room to never be built ever.

Eventually, this society would work to abolish any method of currency, with a push towards fully automated production of all goods and services, to create a society free to focus on intellectual pursuits and the arts.


Just think, the entire society will be as useful as millennials' college degrees.

The subsequent abolishment of income would reinforce the already classless society, and allow racial prejudices to be worked on to abolish them.


Because before the US Dollar, nobody ever hated anybody.

The automation of all good and service production would also dissolve the need for nations or the proverbial State, thus providing a society where needs are met for all, and the advancement of humanity as a whole can be focused upon.


'focused upon' by precisely nobody -- we're too busy waiting in line for the new DPRChevrolet.

The process of building this society, in my eyes, would be as democratic as possible, while still making sure to advance towards the end goal.


So democracy, but only if you agree with me.

It would also try to avoid violence as much as possible


So no violence, except when we're doing violence.

and if violence were to be necessary, would only target those deemed unneeded in the processes of production in industries, and would not be racially or nationally motivated, nor would it have any basis in bigotry or unwarranted destruction.


Beating those who politically oppose you doesn't strike me as bigoted in the least.

Those of all races, religions, colors, creeds, nationalities, sexualities, genders, and anything else would be welcome, so long as their mission was the eventual establishment of this society.


NO HONKIES ALLOWED

Teachings of more dictatorial figures who have donned the Communist mantle, such as Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, the Kim family line, and others of their ilk, would be abandoned and denounced by this movement, while it would adapt the teachings of the more open Communists of the past to a more democratic and free movement.


"Democratic" and "free" need asterisks here.

Environmentally-Friendly resource management, such as renewable energy sources, organic replacements for petroleum products, and nature conservation, would also be a key stressing of this movement, to ensure that humanity can survive as long as possible on Earth alone, assuming interplanetary development is not possible.


The goal is to trigger this new society once capitalism figures out renewable energy, but before capitalism figures out interplanetary travel. Then and only then can the great Communist Amish Nation take root. Commish? Am-unism?

This is just the most basic summary of how I see the Communist movement.


"Basic" is one word.

Feel free to propose questions, scenarios, insults and whatever else you feel like posting, I mean its not like I can do anything about it.


Will I be beaten for it in the glorious revolution?
Trump was mostly memeable because of his silly public persona. Le Pen seems more like the serious doomsday right-winger a la Ted Cruz.


sexist.

#ImWithHer


Racist.
However, if you do support Marine Le Pen, you're a racist. So..... you know....
I'm aware he does other things, are you denying he fans division at all?


Oh he rises to the occasion, no question about that.

So do the Neo-Nazi groups that hailed Trump, and Trump's refusal to disavow a leader of the KKK make you the guys? If no then why should this apply to the anti-Trump crowd?


What? He denounced these asshats like a thousand times. Google "did Trump disavow white nationalists." You'll get a hundred hits. Or watch Spicer address the coverage with Wolf Blitzer. About five minutes in.

Meanwhile, would-be VP Tim Kaine (edit: his son, sorry, meant to put that in here and got caught up linking) is an active participant in the shittery. The DNC and the Clinton Campaign actively participated in the shittery. This isn't six degrees of Kevin Bacon -- they're straight-up doing this shit.

No, I did not say that. I do not support the behaviour of these groups, in fact I would happily disavow them, something Trump refuses to do again and again when it comes to the bad apples on his side. I also meant pettiness as in they're being petty and he is responding in kind, I was not pointing solely to Trump. He is not simply responding, he insults anyone who disagrees with him and belittles the concerns of the people he is supposed to represent. Obama put up with the crap of the tea party and birthers, and I can't remember him calling people losers via twitter...


He didn't use Twitter for that, no.

... or threatening freedom of the press.


Well about that.... Also, it's not like the left needs to worry about the press, they own the press. Hell, they straight-up ARE the press.

© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet