@Burning Kitty Alright, changed that.
As for Battlefield 1 never got into that franchise, so no clue what you are talking about.DiCE claimed it would be an authentic WWI game rooted in history. To make a long story short, they rewrote four years of history and tried to pass it off as the real deal. (half the soldiers on all sides are black, all sides make use of all vehicles, 30 pound machine guns are being used as if they were assault rifles...)
Might if I knew what it was.Expansion pack for the first CoD (WWII), but if you don't like recent history I can see why you never heard of it.
If I am going to play a historical based game it has to be set in the times of the knights.Heard of Kingdom Come: Deliverance?
Sometimes the same thing can be fun, you don't have to learn new game mechanics.No, but when well-known bugs, questionable design choices or other issues carry over to the other games, that tends to be the opposite of fun.
I couldn't stand COD before Modern Warfare.No love for United Offensive?
Shooters feel like they're just reskinning themselves to make it all shinier and prettier. "Go hear and kill anything moving between you and it." Gets dull after a bit....Not just shooters. The only difference between NFS: Most Wanted and NFS: Carbon was it was night instead of midday.
There was also all the asari look exactly alike except Peebee.Wait, people complained about that? Fortunately, I didn't notice that particular type of whining.
bleedingcool.com/2017/08/19/bioware-c…Given the shitstorm surrounding the game, I'm not surprised. Sure, they made some bad decisions (Manveer, for start), but the only criticism I heard was always "It has ugly face animations." Granted, I never played the game, but I didn't notice any other major problems.
Another game developer I will never support again.
Ok, I'll stick him with the Turian pathfinder then unless that person objects.