<Snipped quote by Balance>

That will be discussed. However, because we understand that there must be an input that rises and falls with the changes that take place and we can trace that input, the input in and of itself is subject to being countered.

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

-Ruby- Huh. That's a really interesting approach. It's certainly better than trying to beat the changes themselves.

<Snipped quote by Balance>

I agree.

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

But we still need to figure out that input.

<Snipped quote by Balance>

Maddie's omnipresence would be quite beneficial in the circumstance of determining exactly what said input might be.

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

-Maddie- Just because I can see everything doesn't mean I can see everything!

<Snipped quote by Balance>

You will. I have accounted for the fact.

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

-Maddie- And that manifests how?

Can someone explain to me what your talking about?
I understood parts of it, but not all of it.

<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

We are attempting to undermine the control of an enemy.

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

I think i understand most of the stuff for that part.
What i don't understand is what yellow magic is and the bending or changing of the rules.

<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

Nor do we, to a great extent. Certain concepts tend to act in certain ways, but this being is apparently changing those ways.

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

Ahhhh, so we're trying to find out how he does it so we can revert those changes at the source instead of just fixing the changes themselves?

<Snipped quote by Heroic>

That's not why I dislike the U.N., but it doesn't help.

<Snipped quote by Dynamics>

They sound like losers in general, really.

<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

Precisely.

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

Alright, that helps bring things into perspective.

@Dynamics

Anything you can do about it?