Dion

In Defense Of The Genre [Part II]

@POOHEAD189 Then why reply specifically to that, lol. You assumed he did something wrong on what basis? You assumed Sven must've done nothing wrong before on what basis?

Exactly.

In Defense Of The Genre [Part II]

Keep in mind that someone who has had various complains against them probably deserves to get banned before someone who makes a single questionable act. I do not know all that happened between j8cob and the discord, or who called for 'death of muslims.' But from what I know of j8cob, he has probably made many problems in the past. This could very easily have been the last straw, compared to this other person's racist comment (though I do think that a SERIOUS suggestion of threat against Muslims should be shut down immediately).

@POOHEAD189

Thanks Poohead. Keep in mind it is literally said, in this thread, that Sven was previously banned (not only once, but twice, IIRC) for telling people to kill themselves.

What a dumb argument. Please. Try harder. J8 has done nothing wrong except disagree with people in the chat. If that would call for a ban I'd have been long gone myself. And so would many others.

In Defense Of The Genre [Part II]

<Snipped quote by Hank>

This is why, @Odin. If they want to return they can make the effort themselves.

@Hank

I cannot help but wonder why you made this a rule or protocol but didn't ban people talking about advocating the literal murder of everyone of a certain religion.

I'm not one to get touchy about these subjects but the arbitrary nature of the application of the rules is more than clear to me. I don't care what he said and I don't want Sven to get banned, mostly because he doesn't use the site anyway (hey, where did we hear that before, ho right, neither J8 nor Nyt used the site anyway therefore they weren't a loss anyway).

But it's striking how you decided to handle this argument. 'We don't discuss bans with others' yet Nyt and J8's names have been linked to my own a few times for no reason other than I am friends with them (or in the case of Nyt, we didn't even really get along that well at first to begin with). So why is it that you can link users together but then do not allow them to speak together?

Why is it 'Odin and his friends' when talking about us but not when talking to us?

That whole issue aside, I'm just curious to what your logic is when you are defending someone that said in your own official (official!!!!!!) RPG discord that he wants all muslims to die, but then refuse to do so or even hear an argument in favour of two people who in comparison have said things that were only tame to begin with.

Aria told us that it was because 'Sven was free to say and think what he likes to think, because we do not control thoughts' or something along that line. I assume that represents the opinions of the mod team.

Then I assume that that also goes for both J8cob and Nyt. This was evidently not the case as they were both banned for saying what they thought.

Keep me banned. Honestly, nothing of value was lost anyway. But Nyt and J8 didn't deserve what they got.

In Defense Of The Genre [Part II]

@Hank Why not? What a ridiculous concept.

In Defense Of The Genre [Part II]

@Hank same Sven who was literally advocating killing all Muslims in YOUR discord?

Yet when I try to appeal J8's and Nyt's ban I get no reply? IDK man that shit stinks.

Ｒｏｌｅｐｌａｙｅｒ＇ｓ Ｖａｌｈａｌｌａ － Ｂｕｄｄｈａ＇ｓ Ｉｎｔｅｒｅｓｔ Ｃｈｅｃｋ － Ｏｒｉｇｉｎａｌ ａｎｄ Ｉｎｓｐｉｒｅｄ Ｒｏｌｅｐｌａｙｓ

bump

Ｒｏｌｅｐｌａｙｅｒ＇ｓ Ｖａｌｈａｌｌａ － Ｂｕｄｄｈａ＇ｓ Ｉｎｔｅｒｅｓｔ Ｃｈｅｃｋ － Ｏｒｉｇｉｎａｌ ａｎｄ Ｉｎｓｐｉｒｅｄ Ｒｏｌｅｐｌａｙｓ

bump

Letters from the Front

@Gunther I'm very interested.

Aesthetic shit thread

@GodOfWar it does when you're gonna post trash like that, yeah.

Just realized something in the Skyrim theme song.

There wasn't, but then Skyrim canonized that the Hero of Kvatch was a normal human anyway (since you meet Sheogorath, and the Hero of Kvatch is Sheogorath, etc etc.)