@Mihndar, Poland claims Crimea?
<Snipped quote by Letter Bee>
Rojava's in open revolution. If not to simply maintain its territories against enemies at open war with it then its goals is to at least turn Syria 180 degrees from Assad. But it's only got two real options, it's not like it's going to invade Turkey. Hell, if anything it'll leave the Turkish Kurds to their own decisions once the PKK members serving in Rojava now go home with more battle experience and a rallying cry for their own communities; assuming Rojava survives.
But in cases like the Ukrainian Free Territory, Revolutionary Catalonia, or even the EZLN the name of the game isn't so much to exert ideological power against someone else but to protect what they got from someone else. Historically speaking, the primitive socialism practiced by much of the world before feudalism or even modern capitalism wasn't as organized as the feudal monarch or the corporation to go on the offensive. From a tankie perspective, this is why figures like Lenin are good because they embody enough state centralization to organize resources to go on the counter offensive, where as figures like Makhno may be looked at as the romantic cause that got lost; incapable of seizing extra-territorial power due to the decentralized nature of the commune.
<Snipped quote by Letter Bee>
It takes a lot of organization and cash to project your power beyond your own country. A decentralized syndicalist nation wouldn't have a central body powerful enough to go through the work of invading overseas.
Its like how the UN doesn't really have power projection. The UN is not centralized, so it cannot project any hard power, it has to rely on the willingness of its members to project that power in its name.
<Snipped quote by Letter Bee>
I'm not sure a syndicalist system would have the mechanisms to do that.
<Snipped quote by Letter Bee>
If anything reactionaries will have an advantage in PoW world due to the fact that there is no Hitler or WW2.
Yeah, WW1 historically destroyed the credibility of reactionary and monarchism in terms of politics. That's not the case. If anything, our Great War proved Monarchism is more then capable of standing up to Democracy. So reactionary governments around the world are for more credible amd likely. Won't stop the rising tide of the left though.
<Snipped quote by Letter Bee>
We could give a pass to a few colonies, but most of them should have broke loose. Hell, it's 1960, in the real world where the French and British won two world wars most of the colonies were gone by then anyway, so in a world where Europe suffered more instability, they should have less of a hold on the colonies. .