Avatar of Letter Bee

Status

Recent Statuses

9 days ago
Current Two days ago, Noble Arms is indisputably four years old, spread out across three threads, and the third thread is still ongoing and about to reach the endgame...
3 likes
20 days ago
Can't believe that I actually got an RP close to its endgame, btw...
4 likes
1 mo ago
Noble Arms is now either four years old, or three years and eleven months. The third thread had lasted for more than one year.
1 like
2 mos ago
New Interest Check, everybody!
2 mos ago
My Roleplay, Noble Arms: The ASEAN War, will reach its 4th year in June or July. It's been a long journey.
1 like

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by Letter Bee>

Again - I'm not arguing against it at all. I think it's unrealistic, and the British would oppose it as it would upset the balance of power in the region and destabilize things, as well as being greedy imperialistic little bastards. The conservative and traditionalist factions do not have the 20/20 vision of history with which to realize that would be by far the best deal they could get, and him ceding Crete and making other such concessions would, in my view, absolutely infuriate them, since such factions are rarely motivated by purely rational logic.

I assumed we were playing a setting that allowed more low probability stuff to occur - and "peasant rebellion lead by a military genius and supplied by Russia in exchange for one of their longest running strategic goals" didn't seem all that outlandish to me, to be honest.


1.) Yes. But if the British are mollified by the chance of an earlier Suez Canal, then that ought to buy the Sultanate of Egypt time to violently suppress the conservative/traditionalist factions, at least in theory. The idea is still problematic, but there's still a thin thread of plausibility which makes it a gamble, not an impossibility.

2.) The game was not meant to be 'low-probability'. You say my idea is implausible due to the British being bastards (which I already addressed in the premise) and the conservative/traditionalist factions in the Sultanate of Egypt being prepared to rebel because of that (when they have been violently suppressed before in Palestine itself). Well, I think your idea is implausible because Japan has been under a long period of stability and peace, the Tokugawa have had experience with suppressing peasant revolts, and Russia, which has not even freed its own serfs, would betray the peasant rebels eventually once they show too great an enthusiasm for ideological egalitarianism.

If anything, why wouldn't Russia sell out the rebels, if they do make headway, in exchange for the Shogunate giving them Nagasaki? And the Japanese people have their own conservative/traditionalist factions which would be angry at concessions involving ceding or leasing Home Islands Japanese territory to outside powers, including the Emperor himself - A disadvantage far outweighing potential internal opposition among the Egyptians in the Sultanate.
<Snipped quote by Eldritch Puppy>

Not super keen on a drastic population reduction, though. It kind of ruins any plans I might have had for joining in some jolly good wars on the continent if everyone's dead.

And I had no opposition to the original divergence whatsoever. I'm, well, the kind of person who wrote up basically Nazbol Japan for fuck's sake. My point was simply that I thought my proposal was perfectly sound with what, to me, seemed a pretty damn unlikely scenario. Mine is, also, unlikely, yes. But I assumed that in a world where the British were willing to cede that much control to a non-European nation and the Austrians caving into super liberal ideas in the 1840s, it was perfectly reasonable.


To be honest, I had worries about that last part, and it was my absolute limit or close to it.

As for the British willingness to cede that much control to Egypt, well, it helps that Egypt already had the land the British allowed them to keep. The British and the Ottomans were prepared to drive them off said land, but concessions were made to have the British betray the Ottomans and deal with Egypt as a (subordinate) partner instead.

I'm sure that the Wikipedia page for Muhammad Ali of Egypt said that he already controlled the territory he claimed and was about to overrun the Ottomans themselves.
I think that a compromise can be reached without throwing your nation concepts out the window.

@Letter Bee I could see Britain making a deal with Egypt, but you should make it clear that they got some pretty hefty guarantees from Muhammad Ali that the Suez canal will be under their control, not Egypt's. Maybe ceding the bit of territory that is the canal to the British directly.

@Lady Lascivious I would suggest that, as mentioned before, Japan was swept by a particularly virulent plague that left Japanese society prone to rebellion. With so many people dead, it could justify women getting a more prominent role in society in 19th century Japan.


I am receptive to your idea, especially as it is compatible with everything I said before.

Edit: And I'll accept the plague.
Discord if you guys are interested: discord.gg/pUu5XAcrTg


I joined.
Its Victorian era claims, like Russia claiming overlordship over all slavs because muh panslavism. If something can come out of said claims is another thing entirely.

Aaaanyways. What now? Does this apology means an agreement to loosen the rules or that you're sorry that this isnt what most had in mind? I'm still in. Who else is?


Ah, understood.

It's 'sorry that this isn't what most had in mind', but I am willing to loosen the rules if 1.) it's what most remaining players here want, and 2.) if it's proven that Muhammad Ali's achievements in this RP are not a plausible continuation of his IRL achievements.

Or I could just run an Elder Scrolls or A Song of Ice and Fire Nation Roleplay; that is also an option.
@Lady Lascivious, @Pagemaster, @Richard Horthy, @Wernher:

I'm sorry for mistrusting you guys and assuming the worst about you, while at the same time, I was presuming that you assumed the worst about me. I am also sorry if I gave the impression that this was a low-plausibility Nation Roleplay when I never intended for that and genuinely thought that my own Point of Divergence worked. Please forgive me for my tone, phrasing, and rudeness, as well as the unintentional double standard set by the RP and Nation premise.

I ask for your forgiveness, as well as to listen to me when I say that I never intended to godmode or turn Egypt into anything more than a regional power in this universe.

Either way, I'll be trying for either a more plausible PoD in the future or an outright fantasy or sci-fi premise, assuming that this RP really is low-plausibility...
Okay, that last part was unwarranted. I am issuing a pre-emptive apology for my phrasing and the unnecessary rudeness and toxicity. I am sorry for going too far while defending myself from the accusations set before me.
@Letter Beeokie dokie.


And while we're at it, Muhammad Ali of Egypt was a real person, not an original character, and he did embark on a modernization program for Egypt before his IRL misfortunes in 1840.

Edit: I deleted this second set of lines because it was not called for at all.
@Letter Bee, I honestly think a Japanese female peasant is more realistic than Britain just going “Sure Egypt, you can have this insanely vital trade route, go crazy! No way this could possibly go wrong!”

Also, Egypt with ships of the line? Please. That’s like giving Brasil battleships in Second World War.

Nothing against Egypt being a thing, but it wouldn’t be a decent power, barely even a regional one.


Except that Britain didn't give Egypt the Suez in this timeline. It was the reverse, Egypt gave Britain the Suez, to build a canal with, and that's why Britain made concessions to it.

And Egypt had Ships of the Line IRL before 1840. See the Battle of Navarino, where Egypt got its Ships of the Line destroyed, but then managed to replace them in the years afterward.

And Egypt is just barely a regional power - I didn't contradict that.

I edited this post to add clarifications, btw.
@Lady Lasciviousagreed, a desire to make Egypt powerful. Perhaps if there is some rework allowed, it would be good. I’m willing to play 1840’s Britain, but she’s going to be far more powerful than historical Britain since the British theory was they would always be more powerful than the next two navies combined.


Which is okay. I am not opposing that. And Egypt is not a world power even here. It is not even as powerful as 1847 Ottomans, just better off than IRL.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet