Avatar of Nimda

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

I see that my proposition was highly decided against, huh. Honestly, I'm kind of surprised, but at the same time I sort of expected it.

Although, some sort of figurehead for the group would be nice.


I disagree. This group self-organized, and it'll remain self-sufficient. Leaders will result in resentment, not unity; I know most roleplays have one person to rule them all, but this isn't a roleplay. This is a reality, and nobody can govern everybody in another world.
Alright, guys, I want to write a nice, detailed proposition here. to agree with it, simply like the post. Do NOT reply.

Alright, here goes nothing:

I suggest that we limit our religious beliefs on the OOC. In fact, strictly prohibit it. I say that religious matters are strictly personal, and should be handled via PMs.

It also goes for any situation that becomes heated. Once the conversation raise above normal parameters, it should then immediately be taken to PMs.

Any who do not comply with these rules will be subject to a PM warning from the GM. If the issue escalates, drastic measure may be taken. The GM is also subject to said rules, and if 2/3's of our total group votes, then there will be a PM council headed by the next most prominent member of the group. Once a majority vote (4 out of 5) is achieved, then the council will decide in favor for or against the accused.


I have to reply; nobody liked it and there are issues. For rules one and two, if we move them to PMs, we have literally all the same people, sans perhaps one or two, but in a new location instead; it doesn't change much.

We don't have a GM and won't establish one. There's also not much anyone can do to "accused" other than kicking them out, which isn't worth it until someone becomes hostile.

<Snipped quote by Balance>

Again, "mysterious ways" and all that. I feel that if you can claim that a human elected government is backed by and in power due to god, then I can claim that he can use fortune telling to give messages or signs to someone.


Very few use "mysterious ways" as an explanation of God. Catholics I know do, but that's it.

<Snipped quote by souleaterfan320>

The problem with that is that democracy sucks. Also that it's a stacked deck. You're basically suggesting, not intentionally of course, that it should just be "Dark shut up."
Plus, like david so vehemently put it a year ago, religion is a huge part in the lives of most members here. I get where you're coming from, but with religious stuff I just don't agree it should be banned, and with heated stuff, the non-involved often help cool things to some degree.
Idk I guess. I just don't think it's a great change.


Good times. Maybe eventually my passion online will overcome my apathy again. That would be nice.

<Snipped quote by The World>

It is because even if you don't get angry yourself, others do, I feel. That, combined with the fact that no one has changed their mind ever except myself (I think) over the course of MR makes it pretty counterproductive to talk about with any mix of people who don't agree together.


I'll get angry when something not up for discussion is attacked. That's about it.
<Snipped quote by The World>

I don't know, I never really took your side much, and was too quick to judge you. I think you're actually a cool person. Although, I've learned (for the most part) not to bring religion up on here regardless, as things turn into a giant clustercrap. (Censored it for those who don't like curse words). It's not just you, but everyone here in general. I hate doing it, because it becomes this long debate, and leads to arguments, and I just want us all to get along.


Under normal circumstances, it wouldn't.
<Snipped quote by Unhinged>

Coatlicue: We are being threatened. I'm not saying we aren't. But we're being threatened by Baphumet. I'm saying that we need to not jump to the aid of the one threatening us and risk becoming what we're here in the first place to prevent just because of a wild assumption a certain someone made. Even if it turns out to be true, I value the one who did something incredible but never did anything to us over the one who's killed some of us and hasn't told us anything they're thinking. Besides... *Mutters, almost whispering* Ares trusted him...


So they aren't actually your beliefs. You're fighting for someone else.
<Snipped quote by Nimda>

Galaxy s6.


Not worth price/perf. If I was going that route, I'd just get the Edge.
<Snipped quote by Nimda>

-Aphrodite- So a fraction is not required to defeat the Oblivion?


Not unless that fraction is something that equals 1/1.
I'm considering buying an HTC One M9. Thoughts?
<Snipped quote by Nimda>

Coatlicue: Maybe I fell asleep during rollcall, and I definitely didn't pay attention to the last meeting, but we should have a new oh-thirty two and oh-sixteen, right? Maybe others?


Somewhere. But it won't help if we have a fraction.
<Snipped quote by Nimda>

Coatlicue: No, I mean the new ones.


What are you talking about?
<Snipped quote by Nimda>

Coatlicue: *Pokes at Osiris' cheek* Why not just find the new ones?


Baphumet is blocking it somehow and prevents new ones from being born.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet