Avatar of SleepingSilence

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

My Very Brief Bio

Male, 33 years old. (I'm even more dead than before.)

Likes (other than writing and roleplaying): I'm into all genres of music. I love to cook. I love the outdoors, and walking through the park near my house. (Yes, really.) I read a lot of thriller/mystery novels. And I usually watch seasonal anime. (Or cooking shows. Because Western Media provides even fewer things that are worth watching.)

But as for my many other neglected hobbies, I've played basically every sport. (Soccer and Bowling being my favorite of the bunch.) And I'm trying to play more video games. (Going through my never-ending Steam library.) Plus, I've dabbled in making electronic & metal music, and I used to play a number of instruments. (Guitar, French Horn, etc.)

My 1X1 Interest Check: SleepingSilence's Tavern (Want 1x1 RP's? Please come in.)


Hope you have a wonderful day!

Most Recent Posts

@POOHEAD189 You didn't actually really say anything thing substantive there. Merely giving slanderous opinions. But you didn't specify on a thing or argument said by the people in question. (Or even really get into anything you disagree with.) You don't respect Ben because you don't consider him a political activist? The helk? Is that all it takes?

Also, where's the evidence of Steven Crowder been less popular than Ben Shapiro? Says who? What numbers are we going off of here? Yeah, Ben has more twitter 1.5 million twitter followers. But Steven Crowder has 1.5 million subscribers on youtube. (And since all people on twitter are bots.) I don't really know where you're getting those numbers...I don't think you actually -know- the numbers. But you wanted to throw a random jab at someone likely far more intelligent than many "political activists".

@mdk
Actually, there's a recent debate Ben Shapiro got into between Tucker Carlson, on automation and jobs lost from it. And I think he slightly misrepresented what Carlson was saying. And I'm not entirely sure I agree with some of the statements said. Or at least think it could be contended. No one is perfect. But when the progressive left has nobody like Shapiro or Crowder, all they can do is discredit him through something about his identity, label them. Not actually talk about what he's incorrect about. Like other real conservatives have done before.
"Alt-Right Ben Shapiro". Okay. You clearly know, literally anything. Mmm-hm.
Bias really is the new racist, sexist, homophobic catch all phrase now isn't it? Man, we've just sunk to bottom, were something literally every human on earth has. Makes and renders your facts, evidence and thoughts invalid. <.<

@Penny
Care to literally point out a single thing wrong with what was in the article?
But I can see why her fans are grasping at anything to defend her. Probably the first woman that has smiled at them even if through a computer screeen.

And brittany's letter has far more problems beyond english/american spelling and you know it, don't be disingenuous.


@Dynamo Frokane The letter you posted claiming fraud is being disingenuous by cropping out likely something debunking one of it's claims. Also, that's some pretty worthless ad-hominem logic. My point is that you don't have any actual prove that it's a fraudulent letter. I'm not saying it is, or isn't 100%. But all I did from checking was confirm many instances of them having errors, just looking up UK home office misspelling online has many people freaking out over their names being misspelled. Those errors are likely for reasons of hiring people where English isn't even their first language. So for me to either believe the U.K government who jails trolls, or people who believe in free speech. Going with the latter. Though what exactly are you claiming is being lied about? Them were detained, where they were detained? Banned from the U.K? You assume someone wanting to get attention, a national threat, would write a letter with misspellings? Over thing idea of the government screwing the letter up? (I guess we do have vastly different opinions on government.)

dailywire.com/news/28360/london-polic…

The links aren't broken on my end. Maybe it's not allowed in the U.K. (specific ones? Anyone confirm?)
@Dynamo Frokane Are you denying that those three people were detained? You clearly seem to think they were banned because "unlike the US, we don't allow crazy extremists to speak". So that seems to acknowledged they got banned for thought crimes. I haven't "complained" about it, because I haven't seen it brought up. Do you have links for that?

Also, maybe because one is an actual ideological threat and the other is different political beliefs? But I haven't heard that happening the U.K either. I've heard they were planning on allowing Linda Sarsour inside the U.K.



This letter, seems to be claimed "a fraud" because of it's English/American Spelling. But I noticed it cropped out the end segment of the letter.

Here's Lauren's letter. Note what it states at the bottom.



So while I know less about this "Brittany's" situation, so I won't say she's not the type to fake something for drama. But I've not seen/heard Laura Southern do so. Also, I've personally seen government letters have misspellings and typos. The tweet at bottom shows such evidence of that.

twitter.com/MattPalumbo12/status/9735…

(Brittany) She's addressed this and someone has made a comment referring to it.

twitter.com/BrittPettibone/status/973…

twitter.com/UKOutOfEU1/status/9733107…

Even, if the second comment/part is untrue. There's studies that 60% of UK children don't even speak English as first language.

express.co.uk/news/uk/752032/UK-area-…

twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/973673…

And like I said, seems like there's more problems than speech to deal with.
@Dynamo Frokane Well after looking, I haven't seen you provide anything dispelling such. Don't even really give proper context to the letter either. Never even heard of either (of the people in question) until U.K banned them for thought crimes. Unless I'm mistaken, if so I'll await such counter evidence. Frankly all it does it give them martyrdom due to UK's blatant hypocrisy. You yourself used the words terrorist referring to Laura Southern, so extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

I'm well aware only the United States allows true freedom of speech. This is just another daily reminder. Wish so many people (The left in the US especially.) didn't push the lie that we didn't have more freedoms than the rest of Europe. But I digress.

As for the U.K and U.S's terrorism problem. It is nowhere near equivalent and "your" (The UK, not you.) no real freedom of speech laws, jailing trolls online by the thousands, likely isn't doing anything productive either. Our freedom of speech allows us to criticize bad ideas. You do find the rising crime rate in the UK concerning don't you? Do you think its all "hate" crimes...?
@Dynamo Frokane Ignoring the discussion of "can" the U.K ban on several people, not just Laura Southern. (Yes. They can.) She was banned because of "christian terrorist extremism" and as oxymoron-ish as that feels in the modern era. I would love to see video evidence of her going all Antifa, smashing windows, hitting people with bike locks and the rest that rightfully gave them their label. I don't follow Laura, but I have a sneaking suspicion she never did any violence.

twitter.com/BrittPettibone/status/973…

twitter.com/Martin_Sellner/status/973…

The actual question, is how they did so and just how mixed up their priorities are...If they did for genuine safety concerns. Why did they let hundreds of ISIS supporters/fighters?

independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/i…

telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/24/briti…

theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2015/…

They banned a random rapper before...for lyrics in his music.

(I'd post various links of dumb laws and bans in the U.K, but takes away from my point.)

The U.K is thought policing. And if they want to, fine. But they may want to stop the rape gangs and ISIS fighters, which will do far worse than "disrupt".
Though maybe that’s my Autism and my extremely literal thinking.


>whispers secretly, because you can totally do that via text. "Don't worry, you're in good company." ;P
@AngelofOctober Yeah, everyone did so in the last round/contest. And I highly encourage it. :)
Alright. I've read the three stories and will give my thoughts of the story and its pacing given the word count. Though if I can provide a website for anyone's interest. This shows uses of passive voices, possible adverb padding and ways to make your sentences more concise. It's neat. It can be picky at times, but it's a good tool for analyzing one's work. hemingwayapp.com

It's also useful to use wordcounter.net Because a general rule of thumb, aside from being a good spellchecker. The most useful function, is the option to see how many unique words you have and how frequently words are used. The less you repeat yourself, usually the better the writing tends to be.


Now onto the reviews! I wrote down corrections and thoughts while reading and tried my best to edit down my criticism. So most of it will be in order. I apologize if it's cluttered. Or if it feels too harshly worded. (I tried to not make it all grammatical, unless something really sticks out at me multiple times. Probably failed there. Things I'm correcting I put in yellow. Corrections themselves in green.)

Transparency warning: I've roleplayed/talked plently with @Shylarah before. But I believe I rated/reviwed everything fairly. If not a little bluntly at times.







So hopefully my thoughts/critique/advice is reasonable and not too confusing. There were things I liked and disliked about all of them. Voting on overall enjoyment, I'd probably vote for @Shylarah&@Nevix's story. (But we'd have to ignore the word count thing again. ^-^')
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet