Avatar of Techspert

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

@Techspert
Mierno:

I got the point, but I was making a statement. Anyways, im gonna make some breakfast, feel free to join.


I'm not really a breakfast kind of guy. Thank you though.
<Snipped quote by Techspert>

Thank you. I try, love.


Woah, at least take me out first.
@Techspert

Mierno: ..no wonder shinji is friends with you. You are both incredibly talented, although shinji is quick to react, which is good at times, bad at others.


I think you missed my point. I can make my job description whatever I want because I write the checks.
@Techspert

Socialism is a good thing in minute doses.


That sounds like a rally cry to start increasing socialistic practices. If you only define socialism as the government stepping in to regulate businesses, then yes, a small amount is good. But it's still not socialism at that point.
<Snipped quote by Techspert>

He really didn't have a choice. He either had to endorse Hillary or not be allowed to speak and the DNC, and he needed to be able to. Plus, there was still the slight hope of her getting indited.

Lewis Black put it best. "This is a social experiment. We tried running candidates who were honest, we tried some who were smart, we tried people we like. So this time we're running liars who nobody likes, just to see what'll happen." Paraphrasing, I could give you the video he said it on.


It doesn't help that she cheated and he gave up.

I like that quote. Mind if I use it?

For the record, there exists a book that will make you question your Christianity. It's not by any famous atheist or anything, it's actually by a self-proclaimed "god believer" who's just a christian who is trying to trick people into thinking he's not. Though he's so fucking insane that there's no way to be totally sure he believes anything he says. But this fucking book, man. It's insane. Like I would literally burst into flames if I tried to read it.


You're perpetuating the second definition that shouldn't exist.

Sounds interesting.
@Techspert
Mierno:

Quite the talented individual, arent you?


I own the company that created that job description for the owner, so keep that in mind before you get impressed.

<Snipped quote by Techspert>

*shrugs*


Beautiful description.
@DarkwolfX37

I believe a great deal of his business ventures were profitable, but I don't know enough about his business history to comment on it. Sanders may have been candid (though I disagree with his policies), but he was inevitably a sell-out, and now has a nice new $600,000 beach house of socialism. Your loan statement is true, though in the end, I don't suppose it really ends up mattering much if he becomes president.

I'm not particularly for death on either side, but I will stand by my guns when I say that I believe he'd be a good thing for America. All in all, this election feels like a "biggest loser" contest, but it's what we have to work with.
@Techspert
Mierno:
Yes.


Well, if I were to brush off the ol' resume, it'd be as follows.
*Clears my throat*
Elite Haxor, Computer Wizardry Specialist in the field of Cyber Security and Artificial Intelligence, experienced in and developer of a great deal of dimensional hacking and macrocomputers.
@Techspert

Mierno: what is it?


My job description?
@DarkwolfX37

I don't disagree that neither is entirely optimal. But Donald Trump actually has a serious passion for America and repairing the problems in the country. Yes, he's had failed businesses, but of all of them, only six have filed for bankruptcy. Out of how many? 516. Only six out of five hundred sixteen is a .01162790697 failure record, which is marvelous. We can see eye to eye on Hillary, so that's less of an issue, but Donald Trump's greatest characteristic is the fact that he's anti-establishment. This is the reason the GOP has turned against him, and if he pulls the presidency, Clinton and several "Republicans" are going down with the ship as he ushers in an extremely smaller government. A supposed FBI source has claimed that nearly half of the federal government is so entangled in the Clinton Foundation's crimes that indicting her for the emails alone would be political (and perhaps physical) suicide. Because it would dig up old graves and expose all these corrupt politicians, there were two scenarios. One, risk total government collapse by pulling the entire system down, or two, the case would result in a Not Guilty because they're "too big to take down." This same source also says the FBI is trying to release this gradually, pulling each piece out one at a time like a Jenga game so they can be replaced as they're removed. But if the FBI takes down the Foundation with this most recent investigation, it could be strong enough to destroy all of them but prevent the destruction of the government. Trump is for this goal and wants the corruption removed. I won't even deny that he's probably lied (though the media twists his words into untruths more often than not), but any lies haven't obscured the truth of his campaign. America needs a non-politician (and even Franklin (I believe it was) said the government should be cleansed of all members every twenty years) to guide it, and with its current financial state, a businessman would suit it quite well.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet