Avatar of Terminal

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

I have been writing as a hobby for longer than you have been alive. I have been a regular member and roleplayer of no less than fourteen different online forums during that time (including the old RPG), five six eight of which no longer exist.

I was previously a regular on the Homestuck forums, but I became so sick of thread turnover there that I asked around and eventually found the Guild. Since joining, I have exclusively only participated in Advanced RPs. Before Mahz gave NRPs their own subforum, I used to be an NRP regular in the Advanced Subforum. I am a Guildfall survivor, and know/regularly write with a few others.

If you ask anybody who has written with me in previous RPs, they should tell you that I have a generally open schedule, I post regularly and in a timely fashion, and I never drop an RP once I join unless the thread dies. Some of them may tell you that I have extensive expertise within the realms of Biology, Psychology, and Physics, which I will make no effort to validate since there is no way I can provide hard proof of aforementioned alleged expertise to anybody over the internet (though I am happy to try and answer any questions you send my way).

My favorite fandom is the Myst franchise, which seemingly nobody other than me has ever heard of.

I was a Contest Moderator for the Writing Contests Subforum for just a little bit over two years. I wrote the Moderation Policy for that subforum and I ran a contest called the Twelve Labours; you can still go there and see all of them and the entries people wrote for them in the Contests Section and the Victory Archives.

I have been quadruple secret banned from the guild discord. That is not a joke.

Most Recent Posts

I am pleased to announce that the dissent in opinion between the judges has been resolved. Results for the contest will be posted later today (Monday), likely a few hours before Objective Midnight.

I would post it now, but due to scheduling and other various contrivances born of mortal foibles this post is being tendered from an alternate device, rather than the one storing the completed victory results post. Nonetheless, expect the results to go up as soon as I regain access.

I said the results would be announced on Monday. We may be a week late but the results will still be announced on a Monday, damnit.
I unfortunately have to announce that the results for the Twelfth Labour are being delayed.

There is, for the first time in TTL history, an issue of legitimate dissent in opinion between the judges in regards to multiple entries. We are currently hashing everything out in order to reach a consensus.

If anybody is upset by this announcement, please know that the dissent in opinions is significant in that we, the judges, are in disagreement with each other on nearly every point of note in regards to multiple stories. We cannot just throw up our hands and come to a compromise - we have a duty to you, the contestants, to be thorough and moreover fair, which requires we reach a unanimous verdict.

Results will still be announced in a timely fashion. It may take another day or two. They will be posted by Monday Morning at the latest.
Here are the submissions I received. As a general reminder, I have only included forum names if given permission by the author to do so - otherwise, these stories remain anonymous. Feel free to post reviews for these stories in the general conversation thread. Try to provide some helpful critiques and suggestions, and mention anything you liked.

Winners will be declared on October 27th, and any applicable Challenge Accolades will also be awarded then. All winning entries will be saved in the Twelve Labours Archive with a permanent link in my signature, as well as mentioned in a report in the News section and General Discussion subforums. Once again, thanks to @mdk and the rest of the RPGC crew for helping to schedule The Twelve Labours. Another special thanks to @mahz for cranking out the awesome trophy and titles system.

Once the results come around, if you did not win but feel you should have? Make an appeal to the judges who reviewed your entry. Keep it classy, and exercise some courtesy while making your case, and they might just reevaluate your entry. Please keep in mind, you only get the one appeal. Sometimes you just have to let it go.

If you submitted an entry before the deadline, and did not break any of the rules or conditions of the contest, then there is no reason it should not be here - so if it is not, inform me immediately, either in the Discussion Thread or else via PM.

The Stories:


@RomanAria will be assisting me in judging this Labour's entries. Expect their reviews alongside my own.
Twelve Hours Remain.

An Auspicious Number.
Working on a profile now.
Interested.
I received a query today via PM asking me about the acceptable use of swearing and referring to genitalia in entries. For your general convenience, here was my response.

Refer to the rules.


tl;dr: Use your better judgment.

-Terminal
Terminal
@Terminal But it does exclude negative fame overall -- as in, everyone knows you and you are universally disliked because of it. It might /possibly/ exclude villains that are seen as dashing and handsome but still questionable (Loki comes to mind, in the MCU, though he wouldn't fit this theme -- and he also has a positive regard in the fanbase. Or Joker in the Suicide Squad, as most people understand he was completely mistreating Harley and it was a messed up relationship). You want someone seen in a positive light overall, which is not the only way of being famous. If you want an infamous person with a positive reputation, go with Robin Hood. He's the classic hero of the people if not the law. But for the other way, I mean someone like...to go to extremes, let's say Hilter. Famous? Most certainly. Would I say I like him, admire him, want to mimic him? A resounding no.

So you want a luminary, a role model, one who is admired and imitated and praised, not merely someone who is well-known, correct? If so, I don't feel that famous adequately covers this meaning.


Not necessarily a role model or someone who is admired/praised. A person can be famous without being liked - 'well known' would aptly cover what is sought, as long as there is no overbearing negative connotation associated with it. So you are correct - being well-known is in fact sufficient.
@RomanAria Raia actually did this IC. Well. Not quite hates, but pretty far down. She is a naytheist...and she ended up the avatar for a goddess (long story). So yeah, she loathes that. ^.^

By the way, @TErminal, my understanding of the words "famous" and "infamous" are that one /generally/ has a positive connotation, and the other is overwhelmingly negative, but that technically famous means, in essence, "well known". So someone who is infamous may be famous because of that. So while you note that you did not say infamous, that simply means we are not limited to deeds of infamy. Granted, your clarification after makes clear that negative fame is not sought, the word famous itself does not exclude that interpretation. *word nerd and pendant, feel free to tell me to shut up*

Anyhow, I might just do this, depending on Termite's verdict there (I'm not sure which way I'd prefer to go at the moment), though I can likely do either. Maybe not /well/, but I can do them passably.


Acts of infamy are permitted as long as they accrue a positive reputation as a result. A villain committing a crime in a specific fashion that people end up liking (somehow) would be sufficient for the purposes of the challenge criteria, inasmuch as a villain in the greater public eye might not be disliked/hated except by particular authorities under certain circumstances (this being a general example, not to be taken as the utter boundaries of what is permitted).

Acts of infamy were not excluded. Being infamous because of them, or any other act, was. Your interpretation of the clarification is in-line with my intention.
Interested. Will keep an eye on this.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet