<Snipped quote by Ignacious>
Cutting corners ain't always cool.
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
They tested it on viruses, did you pick up that from your end?
Nope, nothing in that level of detail. How did that turn out?
Webmaster Member
Surprise!
- Last Seen: 4 mos ago
- Joined: 13 yrs ago
- Posts: 11824 (2.59 / day)
- VMs: 0
-
Username history
- Webmaster 13 yrs ago
-
Latest 10 profile visitors:
-
Most recent →
darkred,
Armed Forces,
Blair,
Artifact,
Iwannabeyours,
Simply Not Real,
cinnamochi,
Object 452k,
Host,
Session
Status
User has no status, yet
Bio
User has no bio, yet
Most Recent Posts
Nope, nothing in that level of detail. How did that turn out?
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
Do you think that whatever it was when it attempted to replicate within Sam, it caused him to go into that frenzied state??
That could have something to do with it. Did you notice anything about Sam’s code during that battle?
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
It sounds like it makes sure that it is stuck there, like a revive point.
Although it didn’t restore Sam’s old, crazed state. The program looks like it crashed when you fixed him.
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
I could recover fragments before. Far from complete, probably farther from complete than it isn't.
Maybe between the two we could find some semblance of a source. Anything else in there?
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
Bits and pieces. Is 02's incomplete as well?
It’s the full program, but it’s compiled. Debugging symbols help a lot, but it would take some effort to reconstruct the original.
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
That's what I'm inferring. I can give you what I copied. The stuff I read about before helping Rhythm out was just called "Purge01". Unless you think tacking the underscore-zero-two at the end means something else?
It sounds like makeshift version control to me. Do you have a copy of the source code so we can compare them?
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
The results of it were the thing I was able to find the least info on. So much of it was wiped, I really wish I knew.
What kinds of details do you have? You said this is the second iteration?
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
Well, if the design intention is to act as a restorative and-or protective function, it would make sense if it was designed to try and see what it is trying to restore or protect, you know?
Did the tests reflect that it actually accomplished that protection or restoration?
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
Sounds like I did make it farther than you all did then. From what you described, and what I skimmed, a lot of the same information but with less of the holes filled in.
What's the purpose of the environment detection?
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
I found records talking about exactly this line of work. The previous iteration, based on the name. "Purge01".
Really? What did they have in them?
© 2007-2026