@Sho Minazuki Alright, go ahead.
Double
Member
Hard-Boiled
- Last Seen: 2 hrs ago
- Old Guild Username: Xivilai
- Joined: 13 yrs ago
- Posts: 3030 (0.66 / day)
- VMs: 1
-
Username history
- Double 13 yrs ago
-
Latest 10 profile visitors:
-
Most recent →
Xaltwind,
BobbyJones314,
vue2026,
RPM,
Rune_Alchemist,
Renose,
Lugubrious,
Neziul,
Eviledd1984,
flat lovenote
Status
User has no status, yet
Bio
User has no bio, yet
Most Recent Posts
Like the land of Hyrule, Labrynna is a country blessed with a long, rich history. It is unknown how the land of Labrynna was formed, though it is assumed by many to have been created, like the land of Termina, as a side effect of the Golden Goddesses' creation of the land of Hyrule.
That excerpt from Zelda Wiki seems to indicate otherwise, that they are indeed parallel worlds like Termina is.
Edit: Zelda Wiki could of course be wrong. If it is, then this is what happens when a story-driven franchise is forced to follow the stupid "no story allowed" policies of Shigeru Miyamoto. xD
In any case, there are no indications or even hints of any Sheikah people from Labrynna. Impa is the only Sheikah in the Oracle games and she was sent to those kingdoms from Hyrule to retrieve the Oracles themselves. So I'd still have to say no the Sheikah idea.
Would a Sheikah under the service of Labrynna's royal family be an acceptable character? He would have come from Labrynna with a small retinue of knights to see why Hyrule has gone silent for so long. Of course after a monster attack, he's the only survivor of his group.
In the rest of his backstory he would have also been sent to check in on other places like Termina, so he would witness first hand the effects of the hero's failure too.
You know those are all parallel worlds, right? As such, I can't allow such a character, no.
Internet is slowed to a crawl and doing anything on it is proving to be damn near impossible. I'll try to have this fixed asap. Sorry for delay.
@The Fox Without Accepted
@Sigil Accepted
<Snipped quote>
I'd be cool with that if this was not contested from some bits in the CS:
"As a castle guard, he had little else to do but stand about being bored and angry. Occassionally, he was called in to investigate crimes and settle disputes,"
Let me reiterate, I have not yet accepted the character. I'm waiting for Sombrero to finish the second character before I pass any judgement.
another one says he wants a mask "For his kid" but stands there for days on end wearing it just because?
Oh, you mean the guy who is now one of the leaders of the Resistance and is on a revenge quest to avenge his now-dead son? That guy?
I feel the need to point out that I haven't actually accepted Daurin yet. I'm kind of waiting for the second character before I make that call.
And @Zeroth is absolutely correct, there is a significant difference between Guards and Knights. They both do soldiering, but the difference between them would be like the difference between Cops and SWAT, or Sailors and Navy Seals. One is clearly considered the more elite of the two forces, and probably better trained and paid more handsomely.
And @Gowi, it's entirely possible for Castle Guards and City Guards to be two entirely different divisions. Castle Guards are obviously more trustworthy, hence why they're allowed in and around the Castle, while City Guards stick to patrolling the streets and catching criminals. The difference between them could be as significant as the difference between the Police and Secret Service.
And finally, yes, there is a noticeable trend for having Courage Fragments, but honestly, I was fully expecting that to be case, Courageous heroes tend to be more memorable than Wise ones. Not that I actually agree with that notion, but I can see how others might come to that conclusion when making characters. Oh and yes, I have a rather dastardly plan for what I will do with Fragments that the PC's don't possess. Won't spoil it, obviously, but I will say you guys are in for a tough campaign. In fact, let me just warn you now, I don't plan to pull my punches in terms of controlling the villains, they will be smart, they will be planning, and if you take a wrong step you could very easily end up in a bad place, or even with a dead character.
One more thing, I've found a Co-GM. He hasn't popped into the OOC yet but he's working on a character.
And @Zeroth is absolutely correct, there is a significant difference between Guards and Knights. They both do soldiering, but the difference between them would be like the difference between Cops and SWAT, or Sailors and Navy Seals. One is clearly considered the more elite of the two forces, and probably better trained and paid more handsomely.
And @Gowi, it's entirely possible for Castle Guards and City Guards to be two entirely different divisions. Castle Guards are obviously more trustworthy, hence why they're allowed in and around the Castle, while City Guards stick to patrolling the streets and catching criminals. The difference between them could be as significant as the difference between the Police and Secret Service.
And finally, yes, there is a noticeable trend for having Courage Fragments, but honestly, I was fully expecting that to be case, Courageous heroes tend to be more memorable than Wise ones. Not that I actually agree with that notion, but I can see how others might come to that conclusion when making characters. Oh and yes, I have a rather dastardly plan for what I will do with Fragments that the PC's don't possess. Won't spoil it, obviously, but I will say you guys are in for a tough campaign. In fact, let me just warn you now, I don't plan to pull my punches in terms of controlling the villains, they will be smart, they will be planning, and if you take a wrong step you could very easily end up in a bad place, or even with a dead character.
One more thing, I've found a Co-GM. He hasn't popped into the OOC yet but he's working on a character.
© 2007-2026