LegendBegins

Mahz's Dev Journal

That was fast.

Mahz's Dev Journal

<Snipped quote by Zardoric>

I don't agree with the whole blocking or hiding people option, nor hide all statuses that was mentioned earlier as you are essentially cutting content and censoring yourself from things that shouldn't really matter. It's like sticking your fingers in your ears and singing "lalala"; a bandaid solution for a bigger problem.

@NuttsnBolts

I can't agree with this. User customization is incredibly important and people shouldn't be subject to things they don't want to see if there is a way to get rid of it. It's one thing to never make the feature, but actively assuring that it is never created is against the goal of customization and user preference. Some people just don't like statuses, and that's fine.

TL;DR It's fine to not have it but blocking it for the sake of "Get over it" isn't necessary.

Myriad Reality

Mahz's Dev Journal

I'm getting multiple "A error has occurred, so the webpage was reloaded." Messages, followed by an automatic refresh on the page. Is this something other people are getting?

@Crimson Raven

I haven't gotten any errors.

Mahz's Dev Journal

Just curious if it could be a thing... but could Thread creators have the option (eventually) to delete their own threads? :3

@Kokushi

It was discussed and decided against for the same reason GMs cannot delete posts. The power may be easily abused, and moderators are utilized instead to hide threads.

Mahz's Dev Journal

@Mahz

We love you, Mahz; you're the best! Would there be a "switch" button created next to PMs or would the user need to enter their profile to switch?

Mahz's Dev Journal

@Hank

Mahz mentioned previously that he is would not discourage it because nothing would truly stop people from making sock puppets. They're also useful; nobody in my group would be on the Guild if that were a rule.

@Altered Tundra

There actually wasn't a limit. I would know

@NuttsnBolts
Moderating can be solved by utilizing IP-scale punishments. And if a system is included to link account, then it will be much easier to moderate, as any penalties can be inflicted on all all accounts. Connecting them can only make moderation easier.


These kinds of reasons are why I don't believe any blanket statement can be made for roleplays. They're stories, and the authors decide how they want their story to be written. If they want a different ghostwriter for every character for no other reason than to add realism that a new person is behind every personality that they want to represent. It's part of what makes the Guild so appealing; it's built for the player, not the reputation of the Guildmaster. ^_^

Mahz's Dev Journal

@Altered Tundra

Exactly like those. It's so much more convenient than logging out and back in several times.

Mahz's Dev Journal

@Mahz

Since the current crisis is fortunately over, I'd like to inquire as to whether or not it would be difficult to create an "account switcher" option. Something at the top or somewhere else with a dropdown list of every account the user has linked together; my friends and I would consider this the most useful feature the Guild could have, as we all switch accounts often to change characters. It wouldn't be too difficult to link account info in the database, would it?

Mahz's Dev Journal

@Shienvien

Unfortunately, few do, so it conditions those online to recognize both forms.