Speaking of magic peeps.
Any of you (in the future) want to help prove Abra Kadabra a fraud?
Any of you (in the future) want to help prove Abra Kadabra a fraud?

<Snipped quote by Retired>
I like the sound of this. Let's revisit this idea once you've got your feet under you a little in the IC thread.
Also, a little unrelated, but as much as I love shit-posting, I find it almost refreshing to talk openly about what we have planned in the OOC thread. It's nice to discuss ideas with people out in the open rather than in PMs or on Discord. I know we all like to have the element of surprise (and I know I certainly fetishize "reveals" a little bit) but it can sometimes be a little isolating to see people posting day after day as if ideas come to them like manna from heaven, when really it's because they thrash everything out behind closed doors.
We should do that out in the open more often, I think. Inbetween the GIFs, memes and dick jokes, obviously.
<Snipped quote by Master Bruce>
As for a case-by-case basis, I definitely understand where you're coming from with that. And my comment of it always causing issues wasn't to infer that everyone who multis causes a problem, but that in each game there are enough that do for it to matter.
In regards to villain PCs, every single comic game that I've joined since 2012 - using that date as that's when I first applied to ASM and began RPing with this loosely-defined group - there has been one or two people who apply as a villain, and then either immediately or after a handful of posts flounder on what to do. They have their original concept, but as soon as it comes down to hammering out posts, there's either one issue or another. Whether that be losing direction, having no one to interact with, trying to start inter-player events that no one responds to, trying to just jump into someone else's arc to try and get that interaction, etc. In that first ASM I joined I did the same; as Tombstone, I had a clear plan I wanted to do that would take him on his journey of running for mayor of NYC to use his political power to supplant Fisk as Kingpin. Instead, after a couple posts, I floundered.
Of course, there are going to be exceptions. But, generally and largely, I find this to be the case in each and every one of these games.
<Snipped quote by Sep>
You can't deep fry wisdom.
<Snipped quote by Sep>
Sadness was No. 6, they didn't have enough room.
<Snipped quote by Sep>
Your chief exports are malnutrition, whiskey and sadness.
I hope as time passes we embrace the "One Universe"-ness of it more and more, too.
I think it's tempting to kind of hedge your bets and focus on the ultimised aspects of your character but essentially keep their supporting cast and villains the same – or to do the opposite and keep the characters roughly the same and integrate a slightly more mixed cast.
With the F4 I've kind of done the latter but I'm hoping to do both more the further I get into things – and from talking to a few of you away from the OOC thread, some of you have similar plans. Which is exciting.
Also, @Master Bruce, @Byrd Man, and @Morden Man. I've mentioned this to others in PM, but I wanted to bring this topic up to you three. I'm personally of the mindset that games like these are better off when players are kept to a single character. If they want to swap in the future, sure, but having multiple, simultaneous characters I feel has historically always caused issues for these particular games. Just as villain NPCs tend to do, though to a more extreme degree.
I know a couple others feel the same way. I can guess that Gowi will be opposed to this idea. But I'm curious where you all stand.
<Snipped quote by Sep>
Not that I'm actively trying to make everything about Batman (it just happens), but... the Wayne family canonically hails from Scottish ancestry. It's covered pretty well in this book: