4 Guests viewing this page
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Andreyich
Raw
Avatar of Andreyich

Andreyich AS THOUGH A THOUSAND MOUTHS CRY OUT IN PAIN

Member Seen 0-24 hrs ago

Your argument seems completely based on the semantics idea of "gender" wasn't used for sex since the beginning of time. So that in turn means, the word is meaningless and can be turned into whatever you want it to mean. You could say the very same for other words, but it doesn't change what they mean now. But that just doesn't conform to reality with even a passing glance

It does though, kind of anyway. The thing is that it never explicitly referred to biological differences.

And again if we're going on older the date, the more credible the source. Non-binary and all of those words assuming a gender spectrum are far, far more recently coined.

aeon.co/essays/the-idea-that-gender-i

madskeptic.wordpress.com/2016/09/24/d

rebeccarc.com/2016/01/06/gender-is-no

So, no I flat out disagree that "arguing of linguistics" isn't important. People have been jailed for misuse of pronouns...all these labels are thrown out there BECAUSE language matters. More than how accurate any of them even are to reality and evidence.

You get into fucking appropriation wars like this...

conspireforchange.org/?p=2283

White people can't use two spirit because it's a cultural appropriation, oh fuck I thought it was a 'gender'...Not a Halloween costume. <.<

Also, you failed to explain how we'd be able to push all of this into law, without people being able to abuse the hell of the government. Gender Fluid, means fuck you I'm both and neither, or which ever I please, any time I want. You can't prove I'm lying, I'll sue you if you tell me otherwise.

If you don't even support it, at it's most basic level, you're just flat out misinformed on the word and how it's been used in tandem with sex. Because we aren't just arguing over semantics of language. The left is arguing over reality bending and pushing political laws.

Gender is not a social construct in any meaningful way. Not in the progressive way, in what they mean by claiming that. It is a biological fact. That men have more masculine traits and females have more feminine traits on average.


Alright, here I will concede to you. I do think it is wholly criminal that people are jailed for not indulging the craziness of the mentally ill. However, again, this is all far from the original point I tried to convey. Gender is (Χριστός συγχωρέστε το για αυτό) a social construct. Gender is like imaginary friends. It's not healthy to have them, and not right to encourage people to have them but you can't tell another person "no, you don't have these imaginary friends." It's just one of those things you aren't going to win. How much success do you think you'll have telling a guy in an asylum chained to a chair that no, it is indeed not right to gouge someone's eyeballs out for snack?
Hidden 6 yrs ago 6 yrs ago Post by SleepingSilence
Raw
Avatar of SleepingSilence

SleepingSilence OC, Plz No Stealz.

Member Seen 11 hrs ago

@Andreyich Okay. I'm going to move the center of debate, just to prove my point. Of a previous discussion we had, many moons ago.

You were discussing with me, in terms of race and you yourself using race as a term describing supremacy, prejudices and racism. But race is a term that stated in the 16th to 19th century...not from the very beginning of time. So, if that's really all it takes, because I didn't hear anything else, or receiving any data or numbers. Trans-racialism HAS to be a thing. Right? You should be able to pick whatever tumblr wants to be...

Explain to me, what all these genders mean and what their differences are...I want the science backing all of these terms.





Also, that's a terrible argument for allowing it without question or pushing law or trying to control free speech or people. Because "won't change everyone's mind. So let them win." Perfectionist/Nirvana Fallacy. You cannot shake off the gender spectrum theory, without starting to go into effecting laws. We know this because it's already happening. As Penny tacitly (or maybe sarcastically.) admitted, this is exactly the goal and point.
1x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by POOHEAD189
Raw
Avatar of POOHEAD189

POOHEAD189 Warrior

Moderator Seen 7 hrs ago

Explain to me, what all these genders mean and what their differences are...I want the science backing all of these terms.


1x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Penny
Raw
Avatar of Penny

Penny

Member Seen 12 hrs ago

As Penny tacitly (or maybe sarcastically.) admitted


Why not both!

It's just one of those things you aren't going to win.


Times they are a changin'

Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by SleepingSilence
Raw
Avatar of SleepingSilence

SleepingSilence OC, Plz No Stealz.

Member Seen 11 hrs ago



No. No. A thousand times, No.
2x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 6 yrs ago 6 yrs ago Post by Penny
Raw
Avatar of Penny

Penny

Member Seen 12 hrs ago

Wow go Delaware, fingers crossed that this passes!

Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by mdk
Raw

mdk 3/4

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

Parents are an antiquated notion. I mean it's 2018 already come on.
1x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Penny
Raw
Avatar of Penny

Penny

Member Seen 12 hrs ago

@mdk Right?
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by POOHEAD189
Raw
Avatar of POOHEAD189

POOHEAD189 Warrior

Moderator Seen 7 hrs ago

I can't look at Tucker Carlson without thinking of this
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Penny
Raw
Avatar of Penny

Penny

Member Seen 12 hrs ago

He does have the best face for this sort of thing.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Penny
Raw
Avatar of Penny

Penny

Member Seen 12 hrs ago

Now if I could just find footage of an angry frothing at the mouth pastor decreeing that gods judgement is going to fall upon America as a result of this bill...
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Burning Kitty
Raw

Burning Kitty

Member Seen 5 yrs ago

She needs to be locked up in a mental hospital, she is doubly insane. No amount of therapy or drugs can help her.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by PrinceAlexus
Raw
Avatar of PrinceAlexus

PrinceAlexus necromancer of Dol Guldur

Member Seen 3 hrs ago

<Snipped quote by POOHEAD189>She needs to be locked up in a mental hospital, she is doubly insane. No amount of therapy or drugs can help her.


She needs counciling, theropy or somthing. That ain't normal.

Maybe not insane. She needs help though.
Like the trans disabled woman, these people need help.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Burning Kitty
Raw

Burning Kitty

Member Seen 5 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by Burning Kitty>

She needs counciling, theropy or somthing. That ain't normal.

Maybe not insane. She needs help though.
Like the trans disabled woman, these people need help.


She's definitely insane.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by mdk
Raw

mdk 3/4

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

So in the news today, French presidential runner-up Marine le Pen (who TO BE FAIR is legit offspring of an actual Nazi) has been charged with tweeting anti-ISIS images. She faces up to five years in prison. I haven't looked up the actual images (because fuck twitter and also fuck the National Front probably, I dunno, I'm not french but they always seemed on the crazy side), according to the BBC the tweets included photographs of ISIS doing ISIS things like decapitations and other executions and said something along the lines of "THIS IS WHO THEY ARE."

That's apparently worth jail time, or at least worth talking about serious jail time. Which sounds impossible until you remember that the UK has been locking people up for social media for years.

So here's a conversation starter, right? The low-hanging fruit would seem to be "jailing your political opponents for telling the truth is wrong." Seems almost too easy. What's the actual line you'd draw when it comes to policing speech on the internet?
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Penny
Raw
Avatar of Penny

Penny

Member Seen 12 hrs ago

Le Pen...is facing charges of circulating “violent messages that incite terrorism or pornography or seriously harm human dignity”, and that can be viewed by a minor. The crime is punishable by up to three years in prison and a fine of €75,000 (£66,000).

I also didn't look at the pictures because I have a personal policy not to view things that DAESH is putting out as propoganda but apparently the pictures were of the Jordanian Pilot being burned, a beheading of an american hostage and a guy being crushed by a tank. There had been some text added.

Seems to me that she would have been charged if she had been posting pictures of random murders and the fact that its ISIS related is really a secondary point. I don't know enough about the French law to go much further than that.

As for policing speech on the internet. I think enforcement of existing hate speech laws and what not is probably fine. I'd maybe like to see a little more enforcement of threats of violence (who hasn't collected a few rape threats) but I understand that this is hard to enforce from a practical standpoint. Basically if it would be illegal to do it in a public setting I'd probably be ok with it in an online one.

Things like porn and such are in an at least theoretically private setting and I suppose that images and videos like those Le Pen is accused of spreading should exist in such theoretically private spaces. Provided they dont have calls to kill all muslims/jews/Rohinga or whatever which would be covered under hate speech laws.

Also Fuck the National Front.
Hidden 6 yrs ago 5 yrs ago Post by Polymorpheus
Raw

Polymorpheus

Member Seen 3 yrs ago

.
2x Like Like
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Burning Kitty
Raw

Burning Kitty

Member Seen 5 yrs ago

charged with tweeting anti-ISIS images.

Or the flip side is the French Government supports ISIS and you can’t insult ISIS.

Just another reason stay out of the socialist shithole of a country.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by mdk
Raw

mdk 3/4

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

... but websites have the right to modify their content as per their terms of service.


To what extent? Is this a christian-bakery-versus-gay-wedding-type scenario? Because we've found in the past that one can compel equal services to be rendered in past cases of free speech vs. anti-discrimination. (These may be unrelated issues entirely, I'm realizing now this sounds like an accusatory question. It's not meant that way).
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Burning Kitty
Raw

Burning Kitty

Member Seen 5 yrs ago

@mdkcake vs gay is not speech vs discrimination it is discrimination vs discriminaiton.
↑ Top
4 Guests viewing this page
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet