There were a lot of grammatical errors in this one, Sometimes every sentence in a paragraph. I've decided to only check the first few paragraphs to avoid redundancy.
Ross carried the red cyclamens; a dozen bundled together like the battle scars bared on his bare back.
Bared on a bare back? I'm pretty sure battle scars aren't bundled.
Matching the amount of mosquito bites branding his knees.
This is an incomplete sentence. I'm not sure if it's the quantity or shape of the cyclamens/scars that is being referenced here.
The tropical temperature towered tall as the kapok trees, as sweat drooled from his forehead.
You're not winning any awards for your word usage. I doubt most people know what a kapok tree looks like, and sweat doesn't look or move anything like drool.
Like the unknown creature creating horrendous huffing noises, creeping closer while concealed beyond the creepers.
You know, I had no idea what you were talking about in the sentence before. But now I know
exactly what you're talking about. The unknown creature creating horrendous huffing noises does drool just that way, doesn't it? And I remain concealed beyond the creepers all the time. So that reference isn't lost on me.
Seriously, what the hell did I just read?
Paranoia could only pray was watching something else’s every step.
I think there's a missing word here. Otherwise, I have no idea if Paranoia is some new character, a person, etc.
Elbowing checking the low hanging branches, blocking his march through the mud.
Elbowing checking? This entire phrase could be re-written to improve clarity.
Stopping to spot a brightly colored bird, perching on the opened plant’s pink surface, drinking from the nectar oozing out.
Not ever verb and noun needs to have an adjective attached to it, you know?
Its carnivorous maw snapped shut; silencing shrill squawks.
Presumably, you are talking about the plant eating the bird, rather than the bird eating the plant. But it's not very clear. This could have been much better if you used more than two sentences to show what was going on. It's the only exciting thing that's happened in this paragraph and it's over with in less than ten words.
“Heeey.” Echoed softly in an easily distinguishable direction, as if it beckoned him.
Easily distinguishable, but not to the reader. And I'm pretty sure it
did beckon him.
The same voice spoke out. Their accent was unfamiliar, but still clearly speaking his language. “Come Clossser.”
Of course it's the same voice, it's in the same paragraph, right?
Pulling out a jagged dagger from the holster strapped to his hip, glancing at the blade embedded with his initials; ‘R.K’. He turned around and approached the plea, hoping that he wasn’t the sap about to be snared.
Just have him pull out the dagger in one sentence, examine the knife in a second sentence, and finally approach the voice in the third. You're trying to do way too much here.
Meeting a flash of light coming from the first opening in the canopy, seeing beaming from the skies.
What is “seeing beaming?” I've never seen two words with an “ing” ending put side by side like that, and this is the second time you've done it. People probably don't do it because it doesn't work.
Facing an enormous elder tree that appeared to have a face carved into its trunk; big angled eyes, and a wide open entrance of blackness.
It's a bad idea to start a sentence with one of those “ing” words most of the time. It doesn't show possession. You could say “he/Ross was facing” But I think the present tense “He/Ross faced” would be better still.
“What bringsss you to my humble abode?” The snake asked tongue wiggling out.
You actually forgot a comma. I'm really surprised by that, because nearly every sentence up to this point has had a comma or a semi-colon.
How the adjectives sounded like the words they were paired with made the prose read like some sort of weird tongue twister. Bit it definitely wasn't nine nice night nurses nursing nicely. Which might have been the intention, but it didn't work for me.
I'll admit adventure stories of this nature aren't my cup of tea, but all the same, I felt it could have been done better. I don't understand why he was in the jungle, had to go to a volcano, then traverse a lot of different dream areas to finally get to where he had to go. I understand these places had a significance “artistically,” but in the context of the story there wasn't any rhyme or reason for it.
I know sometimes less is more. But nothing is always, well, nothing.