Avatar of Nimda

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by Nimda>

Zero: *catches you arm, twisting it until it shreds itself apart*
Now you've lost both arms. Why are you such an idiot?


*That version of me fades as a fully intact image crushes your head from behind with triple the force*
<Snipped quote by Nimda>
Zero:
*my nanites disassemble from my shoulder, forming a blade that reconnects to me, that i proceed to shove directly into your face*


*Moves out of the way and applies the same force to your torso*
<Snipped quote by Nimda>
Zero:
* the forces once a gain reflected shattering your elbow*
.. you are really stupid.


*Most of the images disappear—I then immediately strike you with enough force to blow off your arm*
<Snipped quote by Stabby>

I'll do something as well.


I hope Soren is cool enough to call someone if he sees something interesting~
<Snipped quote by Stabby>

I've been thinking we need a new, less remote base for the group, one more accessible. We could have used a multidimensional ad or something like that but Thania has no dimensional travel ability right now, as you said.


It would make a lot of people angry to put out an ad.
<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

Alright.

That could work. Ya got anyone that would be likely to end up on her homeworld?


Potentially. I'll check the reserve drawer.
...
...
<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

Literally the thing in your hider is the only thing saying they can't just hide it in the ToS. They're not allowed to under Title II, that was an alternative that the fuckstain proposed INSTEAD of Title II.He said that instead of T2, they should be allowed to just put it in the ToS that they voluntarily won't throttle or censor.
{Redacted}


It states that they're fully allowed to violate the principles of NN as long as they don't portray themselves as a neutral party. In the FCC release document, it says something very similar, being that companies have to obviously disclose to consumers that they're not receiving a neutral package, and that they're not allowed to switch that without the customer's consent. It states that it has to be reasonably obvious, i.e. not hidden in the ToS. That part of the deal is the exact same but you get extra protections under the FTC.
<Snipped quote by Nimda>

>ISPs bitch about the effects in the two years they've been there
>FTC lets oligarchies happen
>Title 1 does nothing
>Why are you trusting three people to make a decision that will allow five american companies to basically control the planet?
>Because I don't want lobbyists to win ever


>FTC lets oligarchies happen
Kind of like the AT&T + Time Warner merger that's been going on and not blocked by the FCC?
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet