I know I missed one or two but that's all the time I have for now.
I'll respond to any I missed later.
Anything you wanna add? PM me.
I'll respond to any I missed later.
Anything you wanna add? PM me.
<Snipped quote by Ruby>
One last question, then.
In what section of the site do you think would be most appropriate for this? Off-topic, support or RPdiscussion?
<Snipped quote by Ruby>
But it isn't, nothing about those posts was bad faith. Having feefees hurt doesn't qualify something for the label of bad faith. I might have trolled you (no memory of it lol, feel free to provide examples) but even if that is the case, that only seems to show the moderation is taking personal grievances into account for how they run the site which is plainly toxic
Kindly don't delete my posts either. Sadly I didn't get the posts around it, but as you can see, it actually was posted here.
Ruby, I love this site. I love the people I write with and I want it to succeed. I've never personally spoken to you, so it's not as if I'm here for a personal vendetta. I'm not here in bad faith, but you've deleted my post anyway. The solution I proposed was far from radical; in fact, I think it would fix most of this issue. All any of us want is a little accountability and transparency.
Public discussion is necessary because it forces accountability. If mods or admins can't (or won't) stand by their actions in the public eye, then that gives the user base a reason to doubt the validity of those actions. That's why we're so suspicious of this "bring your issues to PMs" policy.
Kindly don't delete my posts either. Sadly I didn't get the posts around it, but as you can see, it actually was posted here.
Ruby, I love this site. I love the people I write with and I want it to succeed. I've never personally spoken to you, so it's not as if I'm here for a personal vendetta. I'm not here in bad faith, but you've deleted my post anyway. The solution I proposed was far from radical; in fact, I think it would fix most of this issue. All any of us want is a little accountability and transparency.
Public discussion is necessary because it forces accountability. If mods or admins can't (or won't) stand by their actions in the public eye, then that gives the user base a reason to doubt the validity of those actions. That's why we're so suspicious of this "bring your issues to PMs" policy.
Kindly don't delete my posts either. Sadly I didn't get the posts around it, but as you can see, it actually was posted here.
Ruby, I love this site. I love the people I write with and I want it to succeed. I've never personally spoken to you, so it's not as if I'm here for a personal vendetta. I'm not here in bad faith, but you've deleted my post anyway. The solution I proposed was far from radical; in fact, I think it would fix most of this issue. All any of us want is a little accountability and transparency.
Public discussion is necessary because it forces accountability. If mods or admins can't (or won't) stand by their actions in the public eye, then that gives the user base a reason to doubt the validity of those actions. That's why we're so suspicious of this "bring your issues to PMs" policy.
<Snipped quote by LegendBegins>
Okay but that's not what was discussed. The point of this site is roleplay, and nobody in question right now ever hurt those fundamentals. People went to the status bar because it seems other methods have failed (largely on account of being deleted for no reason lol) and it reaches the largest amount of people without shitting up IC. Banning people for OOC/Meta critique on the other hand is actually very damaging to the fundamental of the site: roleplay. There is evidently a lot more trolling from the people with ban privileges than the people without.
And pardon me but how does:
<Snipped quote>
or:
<Snipped quote>
or my personal favourite:
<Snipped quote>
qualify as good faith? To me it seems like most people were only following the tone set by this (and that's just the first page), and to remove posts for following the example set by moderation seems nonsensical at the very least.
<Snipped quote by Ruby>
What so you mean "be subject to the site rules" in this context? I have been trying my best to avoid breaking them all up to now, so this reads as if I'm doing something wrong by default. Are you really allowing me to post the thread, or are you simply saying "go ahead and try it because I will delete it anyway?"
I don't want to put any words in your mouth, but I do get the feeling it is the latter. I apologise if I assume incorrectly, but I do wish to confirm you are not out to shut down this hypothetical thread the moment I post it.
I disagree with the suggestion to delete the thread, that is precisely the sort of action that resulted in the eruption of this thread.
I think the base of every legit concern so far comes from a place of frustration. It's obvious they are feeling like they aren't being heard and their opinions are either being dismissed or outright censured. The ability to discuss things as a community is important, and while most people are content to lurk and talk behind closed doors, whatever is discussed in public has the notion that it's being seen. People want to see that they're being listened to, and unfortunately PMs are, well, private, and can feel inconsequential, especially when very little changes after the matter.
Please, I love this site and I actually like a majority of the people here. But you have to understand why people are acting the way they are. And ultimately, that's what all this comes down to: people feel they aren't being heard. I know I'm repeating myself but I have to emphasize on it because I genuinely feel that point is being missed.
<Snipped quote by Ruby>
Would you be okay with me making a thread about the moderation policy on this site, then? Because if I cannot discuss it here, I would wish to discuss it elsewhere. If you claim this is not my platform, please let me make my own.
<Snipped quote by Ruby>
"Anti-mod thing"? Are you trying to insinuate that everyone criticizing your actions as mod/admin is only doing it because he's rebelling against authority, any and all authority, indiscriminately?
Ruby, please do not delete my posts. I am genuinely not posting in bad faith. My post was about having a discussion about how mods should be held accountable, the issue I entered this thread with, and I was not attacking you personally even though people have been claiming that of me.