Avatar of Terminal

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

I have been writing as a hobby for longer than you have been alive. I have been a regular member and roleplayer of no less than fourteen different online forums during that time (including the old RPG), five six eight of which no longer exist.

I was previously a regular on the Homestuck forums, but I became so sick of thread turnover there that I asked around and eventually found the Guild. Since joining, I have exclusively only participated in Advanced RPs. Before Mahz gave NRPs their own subforum, I used to be an NRP regular in the Advanced Subforum. I am a Guildfall survivor, and know/regularly write with a few others.

If you ask anybody who has written with me in previous RPs, they should tell you that I have a generally open schedule, I post regularly and in a timely fashion, and I never drop an RP once I join unless the thread dies. Some of them may tell you that I have extensive expertise within the realms of Biology, Psychology, and Physics, which I will make no effort to validate since there is no way I can provide hard proof of aforementioned alleged expertise to anybody over the internet (though I am happy to try and answer any questions you send my way).

My favorite fandom is the Myst franchise, which seemingly nobody other than me has ever heard of.

I was a Contest Moderator for the Writing Contests Subforum for just a little bit over two years. I wrote the Moderation Policy for that subforum and I ran a contest called the Twelve Labours; you can still go there and see all of them and the entries people wrote for them in the Contests Section and the Victory Archives.

I have been quadruple secret banned from the guild discord. That is not a joke.

Most Recent Posts

@Terminal are we allowed to team up with multiple people giving lives to one character? To team up IC or OOC? and other potentially questionable interpretations of the rules, such as deliberately making a round unwinnable for future round benefits?

What is your opinion on toons? In general, are you going by the potential for abuse, or just by the actual implemented abuse of strong powers, in terms of how difficult and warped things get? How is character death defined and determined?


As to multiple posters per character: It allows me to take more lives away from you all on a per-capita basis, so knock yourselves out.

As to the other questions,

See what happens.
@Terminal for the new round of TTL -- not the Final Hazard, but the First Labor -- I wished clarification of a point. How exactly do you determine what is trite? Usually that means overused. I do recall that you didn't like how I handled the matter of a character beating me, but I wouldn't think a character manifesting their own will and gaining the ability to function as a writer's block because of that will to be something often used, even if the idea of a character disagreeing with the author has been used. *tilt head* Will triteness disqualify an entry entirely? Because I'm not sure how stale an idea I've got , since invulnerable doesn't preclude self-destructing, nor does it rule out the idea of very specific weaknesses, given that many characters are presented as invulnerable with one or two glaring flaws. Take Superman. Or, for a more suitable example given the way you present these Labors, how about Achilles? =P


Here I was merely referring to how subverting the death of one's characters is, in and of itself, a trite and thoroughly played-out aspect of fiction that I am not looking forward to seeing in your entries. Subversion of the need for their death, in a general sense, is trite - regardless of how doubtlessly clever the accompanying excuse might be. As indicated in the clarification though, I would merely be unamused, and I did say I would not be as strict as I was in the original First Labour. I would be unlikely to disqualify an entry just because you revived the character, or said they were playing dead, or had it so the afterlife was already the focus of the setting anyway, etcetera.
@Terminal ...I'm not entirely sure what this is going to mean, but alright. I certainly wish to join and see what happens.

By the way, is it fair to try one round with an unwinable scenario, so as to get information for later rounds without losing lives?


The first round is intentionally going to be a touch softer than subsequent iterations, but I am afraid that is the only 'warm-up' you will be getting.
Oh! Right. Since a character's believability and their suitability for the setting and so forth are dependent upon the setting itself, are we submitting characters before or after the reveal of the setting?

When you say we must use our own characters, ones we created, I wish to make sure I understand the intent here. I have characters I've created that other people played and then returned to me. I have ones that I didn't technically conceptualize, but which I turned from concept to character, and which are entirely mine. I have characters that I was given permission to adopt for use from others, and ones I was given and then reworked a great deal (these I'm guessing are out). I also have characters that are entirely mine but were designed for use in a fandom, or in a world that was not entirely original. Which of these are and are not permitted.


Submit them now. Characters which you have made explicitly to participate in a certain fandom - such as Homestuck for example - are fine. Characters you have adopted from other people entirely are not, even if they have undergone substantial reinterpretation and development since then - if you identify them as being the same continuous entity, they are not really yours, are they? Characters you made using a concept as inspiration are fine, since the concept is not the character itself. If you made it initially, it is probably ok to use.

Additionally, given that we have 48 hours to reply, and that at times one person may be dependent upon another person's post before they may post themselves, and that will cut down the time from the full 48 to potentially far less, how do you plan to handle this so as to be fair to all participants? I have no problem with the 48 hour limit, but I do wish to have a full 48 or at least very close to post, and not merely a couple (and I've had this happen to me in other places for assorted reasons).


I intend to use the forum timestamps. The instant a post reads as "Two days ago," the deadline is reached. As for the consideration of needing to await another poster to respond - that is but another way in which the Contextual Reality is Not Your Friend. You may need to stretch some of your context muscles if you suspect you might not have the time to wait for the other party to post - perhaps their character got caught up in an awkward pause of some kind? Or perhaps you did not wait for them to finish what they were saying or doing? Reality does not hang up because of reliance on one person...unless you let it hang up and start to go skippy bonkers.

I cannot promise that the circumstances will always be fair. I can promise that I will generally avoid placing you in layered circumstances of contingent behavior with other posters since I acknowledge the issue may be problematic. I will leave it to your interacting with other posters to create that complication. My simple advice to you otherwise is to not treat the roleplay as a baton-pass relay race. That sounds like a good way to get all of your characters killed.
I also wish to ask if there are considerations made for those of us who are typing on something where proofing and editing are more difficult, and where autocorrect is a serious issue.

Given the nature of the roleplay, no. It is intended as a merciless sudden-death bonus round, and I already stated I am not making exceptions for scheduling - why would I for other issues? Make do and plan accordingly.

You mention that minor errors might be useful to adjust your manner of writing. I find this interesting. I also wonder if consideration will be given for narrative style and the voice of the character whose perspective is being used. I do hope it will. Additionally, I wonder how strict you are going to be in terms of what constitutes an error. For example: there are stylistic rules that different people handle with varying degrees of attentiveness, like placement of certain commas (the most obvious example, of course, is the Oxford comma, but there are other instances where one might or might not use a comma and it's a matter of how one wishes the sentence to flow), the use of a conjunction to start a sentence or a preposition to end it, and how one deals with pronouns for a single entity of indeterminate gender. If there are to be consequences that pertain to what in the end is a personal choice even if perhaps not technically correct (and there are debates over what are claimed to be the "official" rules for these and other issues), I would like to know. More serious transgressions, such as the egregiously erroneous use of "like" in places where it might be put conversationally but not in formal writing, or deliberate technical violations done for effect, are also a concern.

There can be stylistic differences in writing that remain technically flawless in composition - as demonstrated by @mdk, the showoff. As you noted though, people may make specific stylistic or aesthetic decisions in writing a passage that substantially alter its flow - and for those of you who have been paying attention to my reviews, you will know I am a stickler for passage structure that reads awkwardly. Such stylistic decisions might affect what I report to you, but have no practically meaningful effect on the information being presented. In effect, there is no 'error' too small for me to ignore, but some are so small or limited that any changes rendered are sufficiently negligible as to be irrelevant. You may find that distortions caused by deliberately erroneous stylistic choices will not greatly impede your ability to perceive the Iteration.

Or in more simple terms: The only errors you should be mindful of are errors serious enough that, in accumulation, would detrimentally impact your ability to read and interpret my own passages if I were to adopt those same errors.

Since I am feeling generous, here is an example incorporating your point regarding gender identification. Those who know me well are probably aware that I loath gender pronouns and, in casual conversation, will refer to most individuals as 'they' - and I typically assert that the usage is grammatically correct, though I expect there are plenty who would disagree with me. I will be aiming to keep my initial responses more generalized and free of such personalized clutter so as to avoid ambiguity. By default, the meaning of everything I write should be immediately apparent and clear. If you then began using they as a gender neutral first-person pronoun, I would likely adopt that method of referral, and that might not detract terribly from your ability to understand what I write - unless combined with other ambiguous usages of various pronouns or the word they specifically that would render its usage ambiguous. You could argue that such usage is not an error, and I would be inclined to agree - it is less me being strict about punishing errors and more the contextual reality adapting to what you present it with.

In essence: As the spiteful Termite I am, I will be going out of my way to pick out and incorporate 'stylistic choices' from your writing that make it harder to understand overall. I might also incorporate certain elements of your writing that, while harmless on their own, might synergize with other seemingly innocuous elements of writing to create an unintelligible mess. I will not be so unreasonable as to create patterns of error that do not exist, but I will take advantage of even the smallest genuine mistakes made.
The Final Hazard OOC has been posted. If you have questions about it, post them there, not here.
The Twelve Labours


The Final Hazard

"History is an agreed-upon fiction."
Napoleon

Current Setting:
Active Iteration
There is no end in sight...
If You want to Participate in the Second Iteration, wait for the first one to end.
Final Hazard will be up shortly.
The Twelve Labours

The first of the new series of Labours begins. For those of you who are just dropping in and have no idea what this is, take a peek at The Twelve Labours Introduction Thread (it's a quick read, I promise).

For those of you who participated in the first iteration of the Twelve Labours, you may be interested to know that the new series will have a distinctively different thematic orientation - born both out of necessity and also because even my sadism has limits. Each task will less focused on mold-breaking and more on exploration with different forms of narrative - it should become evident what I mean by that once you take a peek at the first task below.

Let the First Labour commence. Submission ends at Objective Midnight, February 12th.
Entry Rules:

1. Jaffar's (left) thumb.
2. Follow the standard guild rules.
3. Obey the Dark Lord Sauron's rules as well (just to cover all the bases).
4. Follow MY rules too. Let it never be said we did not warn you.
5. Send your entry to @Terminal by February 12th.
6. Be sure to include whether or not you want your story to remain anonymous! I will add your name only if I am given your permission!
7. Any explicit/mature material must be kept off-site. I will only post links to them with NSFW notices.
8. I reserve the right to simply toss out any story if it does not possess a basic modicum of good sense and taste. Do not make me.
9. All stories must adhere to a certain standard of quality expected of good storytelling.
10. You must use your own characters. Preexisting characters from franchise settings may only be alluded to.
11. If your setting is borrowed from a franchise, make sure to include a disclaimer and credit the original inventor of the setting used.
Prizes:

All winning entries will receive a forum trophy as well as a unique, custom forum title which they can activate and deactivate at their leisure. Additionally, winning entries of particularly exceptional quality will be awarded Challenge Accolades.

All winning entries will also be saved to a public archive, a link to which will be permanently available in my signature! I personally post in the News and Discussion subforums of the guild to congratulate and announce the winners as well. As a reminder, unless you specifically give me permission to include authorship of an entry, every posted story will remain anonymous (awarded trophies can also be hidden in your user profile, so you will not show up if people are examining the trophy groups).
The Twelfth Labour

"Silly man, with your bones beneath your flesh! Where is the use in that? You would do better to wear your armor over your skin, like me."
Anansi the Spider



Alright, I have been trying to get collabs going through the chat but that clearly is not working out.

Going to start work on a normal IC post.
© 2007-2026
BBCode Cheatsheet