Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by POOHEAD189
Raw
Avatar of POOHEAD189

POOHEAD189 Warrior

Moderator Seen 23 min ago

I call Dream BS because as anyone who's anyone knows Tracer's rewind only rewinds three seconds and I expect consistency even in dreams and unless you have super sperm you're not getting her pregnant right after ejaculation ergo Dream BS, sir. You can trust me I'm a Tracer scientist.


Maybe Tracer's womb acts fast too.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Normie
Raw

Normie

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

nibba it was a dream you don't logic in dreams

but yes it was such a huge rewind that she couldn't blink anymore for weeks afterward, and i was chasing her around the house making fun of her that she couldn't get away from me with all her time energy used up
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Fabricant451
Raw
Avatar of Fabricant451

Fabricant451 Queen of Hearts

Member Seen 5 hrs ago

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

Maybe Tracer's womb acts fast too.


I didn't consider this.

I'll have to get the scientists to test this hypothesis.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by POOHEAD189
Raw
Avatar of POOHEAD189

POOHEAD189 Warrior

Moderator Seen 23 min ago

I didn't consider this.

I'll have to get the scientists to test this hypothesis.

*adjusts glasses* We at the Hanzo school of thought think outside of the box. Preferably from far away with a nocked arrow.

nibba it was a dream you don't logic in dreams

but yes it was such a huge rewind that she couldn't blink anymore for weeks afterward, and i was chasing her around the house making fun of her that she couldn't get away from me with all her time energy used up


You're a sick man.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by mdk
Raw

mdk 3/4

Member Seen 5 yrs ago

The blue and non-white parts of Commiefornia can secede and they'd be doing the rest of us a favor.


Classy.

nibba


Yeah let's not.

4x Like Like 1x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by SleepingSilence
Raw
Avatar of SleepingSilence

SleepingSilence OC, Plz No Stealz.

Member Seen 3 hrs ago

@mdk Wow. One of the few times I've actually chuckled at meme pictures on this thread.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Normie
Raw

Normie

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by Normie>

Classy.

<Snipped quote by Normie>

Yeah let's not.



deep blue parts of the country are shitholes, i agree

is the word nibba banned or are you just personally offended by it
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Mao Mao
Raw
Avatar of Mao Mao

Mao Mao Sheriff of Pure Hearts (They/Them)

Member Seen 0-24 hrs ago

So apparently this is a thing. Recent push for the 51st state of New California. Fun stuff. New California Declares Independence From Rest Of State.


'New California' is like #Calexit, Six Californias, and Three Californias. They are failed attempts to divide California for various reasons like property taxes, differences (like political) between rural and urban counties, splitting up the fifty-five electoral votes, and securing countries that usually go for either Democrat or Republican.

It will fail and California will still be together. Then again, who knows. 2018 might just be as crazy as 2017.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by mdk
Raw

mdk 3/4

Member Seen 5 yrs ago

is the word nibba banned or are you just personally offended by it


Mostly the latter. We don't ban words, but we do have policies against the (very) thinly-veiled meaning.

Mostly the latter though.
1x Like Like
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Iuniper
Raw

Iuniper

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by Iuniper>

the most painful thing in the world is tfw no dwarf gf


I mean there was that one redhead dwarf in charge of munitions, Harding, that had one line of romance dialogue but .. nothing else. :(
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by mdk
Raw

mdk 3/4

Member Seen 5 yrs ago

unrelated...

Hidden 6 yrs ago 5 yrs ago Post by Polymorpheus
Raw

Polymorpheus

Member Seen 3 yrs ago

.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by POOHEAD189
Raw
Avatar of POOHEAD189

POOHEAD189 Warrior

Moderator Seen 23 min ago

So we now have some good evidence of Trump Money Laundering and 2017 was one of the top 3 hottest years ever recorded.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Penny
Raw
Avatar of Penny

Penny

Member Online

All evidence criminal and scientific was engineered by a shadowy democratic clique that is right now planning to take your guns and turn America into a UN camp where you will be forced to use the correct pronoun at gunpoint. And I do mean all evidence. For everything.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by POOHEAD189
Raw
Avatar of POOHEAD189

POOHEAD189 Warrior

Moderator Seen 23 min ago

*snaps* Dammit
Hidden 6 yrs ago 6 yrs ago Post by SleepingSilence
Raw
Avatar of SleepingSilence

SleepingSilence OC, Plz No Stealz.

Member Seen 3 hrs ago

So we now have some good evidence of Trump Money Laundering and 2017 was one of the top 3 hottest years ever recorded.


It's just more attempts to directly tie Trump with the Russian Conspiracy, and the guy that claims this, is the very guy who made the dossier which Hillary Clinton paid for. Which included a story about pissing on prostitutes...

Can't say I'm anything but skeptical of that man's word.

They have claimed that for global warming literally every consecutive year now. And they were wrong each time.

2015 was debunked.

climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientist…

2016 was debunked.

wattsupwiththat.com/2017/01/19/noaa-d…

And in that very article it states "putting it behind 2016 and 2015 in that agency's database." Implying it's the third hottest year behind those two years which is false data/statics. And now I'm seeing people trying to argue that it's the "second" on google. So I'll wait for more information to come out for this one, but...

science.house.gov/news/press-releases…

climatechangedispatch.com/u-s-congres…

Whether true or not, the NOAA, which is always consistently used by the left. Has been accused many times, including by former employee's of manipulating data, why they'd do this is obvious.

Edit: Also just to stick my foot into the "global warming" idea, let's be honest what you have to believe to be apart of that movement. The whole thing is CO2 is the major (and basically) only factor that predicts climate change and it's predominantly or completely man made. And giving the government more power is the only way to combat the problem. (so one side is promising to change/solve the problem of weather...)



At 6:30 he commits the biggest fallacy that is basically the whole end game in this. So if the earth is "warming" but it's caused by natural causes. Nothing can actually be done about it. Which means no more millions/billions of funding being wasted on vanity projects.

forums.tesla.com/forum/forums/100-rea…
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by Andreyich
Raw
Avatar of Andreyich

Andreyich AS THOUGH A THOUSAND MOUTHS CRY OUT IN PAIN

Member Seen 0-24 hrs ago

All evidence criminal and scientific was engineered by a shadowy democratic clique that is right now planning to take your guns and turn America into a UN camp where you will be forced to use the correct pronoun at gunpoint. And I do mean all evidence. For everything.


too bad there's none of said evidence
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by j8cob
Raw
Avatar of j8cob

j8cob The Gr8est / The J8est

Member Seen 1 mo ago

So we now have some good evidence of Trump Money Laundering and 2017 was one of the top 3 hottest years ever recorded.


>listening to the Fusion GPS shit and citing it as actual evidence of anything despite it being known as an almost complete fabrication paid for by opposition

Really activates my almonds.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by POOHEAD189
Raw
Avatar of POOHEAD189

POOHEAD189 Warrior

Moderator Seen 23 min ago

So we won't at least take note of this. Just a bunch of denials.
Alright.



@SleepingSilence So despite myself I actually looked at your climate change links and video.
You do know that every source you linked was biased, and that Marc Morano has literally no scientific expertise and has been called the 'Climate Change Misinformer of the Year' a few years back, and that Bill Nye caught him in pigeon holding the facts like, 2 minutes into your video.

Do you actually try to look up unbiased facts or do you look up facts that adhere to your preferred world view? And that is a legit question, I am not trying to be an ass to you.
Hidden 6 yrs ago Post by SleepingSilence
Raw
Avatar of SleepingSilence

SleepingSilence OC, Plz No Stealz.

Member Seen 3 hrs ago

So we won't at least take note of this. Just a bunch of denials.
Alright.



@SleepingSilence So despite myself I actually looked at your climate change links and video.
You do know that every source you linked was biased, and that Marc Morano has literally no scientific expertise and has been called the 'Climate Change Misinformer of the Year' a few years back, and that Bill Nye caught him in pigeon holding the facts like, 2 minutes into your video.

Do you actually try to look up unbiased facts or do you look up facts that adhere to your preferred world view? And that is a legit question, I am not trying to be an ass to you.


Seriously none taken.

Though the very first part of the post, despite being vague, is kind of broadly doing that. Whether to me or not, it's still at least ad-hominem that doesn't really add any conversation. But I'm not taking it personally in that regard, assuming you meant the others who failed to address you with any counter information. (you did use a separation thingy, so I'll assume that's the case. ^-^')

I see this proclaimed a lot, so I feel like debunking this general idea through your question. Hopefully you'll better understand my position.

You cannot just state "bias" information, and expect that to be a proper counter to anything I stated. That doesn't actually make it wrong or right. Everyone in the world has bias and you can easily be accused of the same thing, but that wouldn't matter. Even sites, I wouldn't normally use, because their often bias themselves. Mashable and Talking Points is left leaning bias sites.

mediabiasfactcheck.com/talking-points…

mediabiasfactcheck.com/mashable

You need to counter what was actually wrong in the articles, the 2015 article has an absolute truckload of inside link sources and I at least discredited NOAA through various sources on their previous shady practices.

I'm probably not always providing the best resources possible, but I blame google's outright burial of possible better content. And because I can't be expected to do everything for only a passive response, but I do sincerely at least do a through skimming before I post anything. (the video was just sort of, off the cuff, but Bill Nye should never be taken seriously after his gender videos/outright denial of actual science/biology.)

Also, whether that one guy has done things wrong in the past. "Marc Morano" I'm willing to accept is true, if you provide me with any sources. But otherwise, who cares what someone is called? Trump was/is called Hitler, doesn't make it true. But the fact you'd seemingly defend Bill Nye, who is outright proclaiming to jail skeptics is precisely why I think their is caution by many in the first place, because it leads to extremism politics like Bill Nye. Who straight up lies and misleads his audience.

My follow up question to you, which may sound like a leading question, but it really is exactly what you need to believe...

Do you agree with my assessment (and Bill Nye's) That mainstream 'climate change' theory) is that CO2 is the major problem, it will lead to global catastrophe and it's solely/nearly all man made and it can only be fixed by big government intervention and somehow our example, can also allow us to do the same things for all third world countries, somehow allowing us humans to subsequently change the weather?

↑ Top
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet