<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>
If God did tell someone what to write, then there is no reason to believe there are errors. If God is all powerful and all knowing, then there is even less, because he would know how to set up the variables correctly to achieve the results he desired. If you want what Dark said
<Snipped quote by DarkwolfX37>
Here, he's incorrect. But it should be interpreted literally unless there is reason to believe otherwise.
<Snipped quote by DarkwolfX37>
To the first four, we're discussing the NT; the OT is essentially ubiquitously Hebrew. If you want to claim someone made up words, find an example. Burden of truth.
Historians care what the past was, including the documentation of alterations in literature. To use that example, it would be like you saying Harry Potter was originally a Thomas the Tank Engine fan fiction with no legitimate sources to back it up.
I say "primarily in Greek" because I don't know of any books that weren't written in Greek, but I'm not certain that there aren't any. But there literally is no translation issue.
The key is that it doesn't. I don't recall saying this, but it's a hypothetical that means literally nothing. The Bible is either a book of truth or a book of lies, and a hypothetical like that entirely undermines the premise of the debate, making it invalid. You have no sources to back up your argument and I have a plethora peer reviewed documents that I've linked several times.
I wrote this as I went and don't feel like putting all of the effort to waste. Besides, it's a cheap tactic to end it after making all sorts of claims.
I have an example but it's not going to matter to you because I don't know the source the person I heard it from used.
And there are plenty of historians that agree that there were several translation errors. But that's not the forefront of what they do. They're more interested in fucking events that happened, not whether or not the stuff was translated correctly.
Yes it does. There are tons of verses that all say "the earth is flat" but you choose them as verses that aren't supposed to be literal because if you took them as literal the way you're supposed to, you'd have to reject all scientific knowledge so far, and you don't want to do that.
And no, it's not black and white. It can be a book with truth and lies in it. There are all sorts of books like that. Look at islam, it's got tons of true shit in it and tons of lies in it. The bible isn't any different.
I probably took a screenshot but it was years ago, back around the time of the nye ham debate. "Almost photographic memory."
Well one of us is going to do it and I'm more stubborn than you. Again, we know how this ends, we know this goes on forever, and we know we're both stubborn enough to keep going so long that we veer off into completely unrelated topics and argue for days or weeks over what could eventually turn into fucking plant science or something else equally unrelated, and we've been really good about not dominating the OOC with long pointless arguments, so
Kimberly,
The World,
Delgado,
TruckKun,
Scarifar,
Threads of Fate,
Dark Cloud,
Tribs,
Taku,
XoXKieroBombXoX
